Change a variable to transform a series into a power series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around transforming a given series into a power series through a change of variable. The series in question is presented in a form that is not immediately recognizable as a power series, prompting participants to explore how to manipulate it to achieve that form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of transforming a series by changing a variable, with some confusion about the implications of such a transformation. There are attempts to define a new variable, ##y##, in terms of ##x## to facilitate this transformation. Questions arise regarding the appropriateness and clarity of the substitutions being proposed.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different substitutions for the variable, with some participants questioning the clarity and correctness of their definitions. Multiple interpretations of the transformation process are being considered, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the challenge of defining a new variable that simplifies the series into a power series format, while also addressing potential misunderstandings about the relationship between the variables involved.

whitejac
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following series are not power series, but you can transform each one into a power
series by a change of variable and so find out where it converges.

0 ((3n(n+1)) / (x+1)n

Homework Equations



a power series is a series of the form:

a0 + a1x + a2x^2 ... + ...

The Attempt at a Solution



What exactly does it mean by transforming a power series by changing a variable? the only thing I could look up and find was converting to another coordinate plane in calculus 3 which would be further along than this problem focuses on... but i am still confused as i can't see how a series can be in a separate plane like that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Introduce a new variable ##y## as a function of ##x##, such that if you write your series in terms of ##y## it takes the form of a power series. Then determine for which values of ##y## that power series converges. Finally, translate these values back to values of ##x##.
 
Let me see if i understand this then...

Let Y = Y(x),
Where Y(x) = 1 / (x - 1)

Then we would have:

3n(n+1) / ( 1/ (x -1 +1)n)
= 3n(n+1) (x)n

this would in turn be a power series, yes?
 
whitejac said:
Let me see if i understand this then...

Let Y = Y(x),
Where Y(x) = 1 / (x - 1)
No, this isn't the substitution. There is another that should be much more obvious.
whitejac said:
Then we would have:

3n(n+1) / ( 1/ (x -1 +1)n)
= 3n(n+1) (x)n

this would in turn be a power series, yes?
You have a series whose general term is ##3^n(n + 1) \cdot \frac 1 {(x + 1)^n}##. You'd like to end up with ##3^n(n + 1) \cdot y^n##. What's the most obvious substitution to make?
 
how is mine not obvious enough? It removes the added 1 and puts y back in the numerator.
 
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
then you would have the relationship I intended to have:

Mark44 said:
3n(n+1)⋅yn
 
whitejac said:
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
That works, but why not write it as ##y = \frac 1 {x + 1}##?
Then ##y^n = \frac 1 {(x + 1)^n}##
 
So, essentially, my answer could work but you could also simply say "Let y = all of the business that makes this difficult"?
 
whitejac said:
So, essentially, my answer could work but you could also simply say "Let y = all of the business that makes this difficult"?
No, not really.

whitejac said:
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
When you define something (in this case, y), you generally start it with "Let y = <whatever> ". What you wrote is the inverse of the function that defines y.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: whitejac
  • #10
Mark44 said:
No, not really.

When you define something (in this case, y), you generally start it with "Let y = <whatever> ". What you wrote is the inverse of the function that defines y.

Yeah, I noticed that. I guess it makes sense. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K