Change in elect. PE given work, KE, charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the change in potential energy (PE) of a charge when work is done on it. The work done to move a charge of -8.4*10^-6C from point A to point B is 1.9*10^3J, and the kinetic energy (KE) at point B is 4.81*10^4J. The correct approach to find the change in PE is to use the equation W = ∆KE + ∆PE, which accounts for the work done, the change in kinetic energy, and the change in potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy (Uelect) and its relationship with charge and voltage.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle in physics.
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy (KE) and its calculation.
  • Basic grasp of the concepts of work done by external forces on charged particles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem and its applications in electric fields.
  • Learn about electric potential and how to calculate it using Uelect = qV.
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in conservative forces.
  • Review problems involving the movement of charges in electric fields to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric potential energy and work done on charged particles.

kevnm67
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The work done by an external force to move a -8.4*10^-6C charge from point a to point b is 1.9*10^3J. If the charge was started at rest and has 4.81*10^4J of KE when it reach pt. B, what's the change in PE of the charge?


Homework Equations


Not sure
W=change in U
PE=KE


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried a few things but I am just not sure how to approach this problem. I attempted V=Uelect/q and W= change in U, U=qV... just looking for some direction, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kevnm67 said:
Not sure
W=change in U
PE=KE
Two points of contention:
i) The work done on a system increases the total energy of the system, not just the potential energy
ii) Why must PE = KE ?? PE = KE is actually a statement demonstrating the case when there is purely conversion of energy from kinetic to potential or vice versa without any additional energy input into the system.
 
hi kevnm67! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
kevnm67 said:
The work done by an external force to move a -8.4*10^-6C charge from point a to point b is 1.9*10^3J. If the charge was started at rest and has 4.81*10^4J of KE when it reach pt. B, what's the change in PE of the charge?

i don't think the amount of the charge, or the fact that the field is electric, has anything to do with the question :rolleyes:

you're given ∆KE and W, and you're asked for ∆PE :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kevnm67! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


i don't think the amount of the charge, or the fact that the field is electric, has anything to do with the question :rolleyes:

you're given ∆KE and W, and you're asked for ∆PE :wink:


Thanks for the responses.

OK, so I am still not sure. Work= change in Uelect. and Uelect.= q'V?

So what exactly is going on here? You have a charge that moves in a straight line from its initial position (where KE=0) to point B where it has 4.81x104J. The question asks for change in PE. So it has more PE at point A? and looses it to KE as it moves to B? How do you determine which equations to use and why? I am confused and have not seen a question like this so I completely lost. I appreciate the help
 
hikevnm67! :smile:

I don't think it matters whether it goes in a straight line or not …

try using just W = ∆KE + ∆PE :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hikevnm67! :smile:

I don't think it matters whether it goes in a straight line or not …

try using just W = ∆KE + ∆PE :wink:

OK, I figured out why I started to try to come up with a nonsense explanation...Thanks Tim, your correct and this was the first thing I tried and could not figure out why I did not get the correct answer. This question is from an old exam my professor posted and my mac deleted the negative sign in front of the exponents so my answer was a little off :)

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K