Change in Electric Potential from the Surface of a Conducting Sphere to Infinity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric potential related to a charged insulating spherical shell. The original poster describes a scenario involving points at different locations relative to the shell and seeks to understand the change in electric potential from the surface of the shell to infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between electric potential and the work done in bringing a test charge from infinity to the surface of the spherical shell. They express confusion about the potential differences and the implications of the shell's properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have engaged in clarifying the original poster's understanding of electric potential, with one noting a unit conversion error that affected their calculations. There appears to be an ongoing exploration of the concept without a definitive resolution yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a desire to grasp the conceptual framework rather than receive a direct solution, indicating a focus on understanding rather than just obtaining answers.

jhfrey89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let me preface this as this is my first post on this forum. I'm a physics major at Virginia Tech and I've lurked the forum for a while to help understand concepts that may not be intuitive initially. I'm stuck on this one concept, so I decided to give posting a shot.

Without further ado...

1. An insulating spherical shell with inner radius 25.0 cm and outer radius 60.0 cm carries a charge of + 150.0 \muC uniformly distributed over its outer surface. Point a is at the center of the shell, point b is on the inner surface and point c is on the outer surface.

What will a voltmeter read if it is connected between c and infinity?




2. Given \intE*dl = V, I'd be integrating over infinity because it's an infinite path to... infinity.



3. It's more conceptual than anything, so I'm really at a loss. The change in potential from the center of the shell to the inner surface is 0V, and the change between the shell itself is 0V, as it's a conductor.

I'd rather just get the concept than someone spit out a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stupid me. I was right - I just messed up my units (read it as nano rather than micro).

Thanks anyways!
 
So then...how did you do this?
 
Well, think about it. If you have a charge, be it a point charge, sphere, or spherical shell, then it has some electric potential. If you bring in a test charge from infinity, you're going to have to do the that amount of work on it to bring it to the charge (assuming the point charge with the potential is a positive charge). It's the summation of all the work from infinity to the surface of the sphere.

My issue was that I was using a nanocoulomb rather than a microcoulomb, so I was off by a power of 10^3.
 
oh, I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
38
Views
15K
Replies
23
Views
5K