Change in gravitation potential energy in space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the change in gravitational potential energy for an object of mass 750 kg lifted to a height of 6.8 x 10^6 m above the Earth's surface, utilizing gravitational potential energy formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the gravitational potential energy formula and the calculations involved, questioning the correctness of the arithmetic and the treatment of parentheses in the equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in the original poster's process while others raise concerns about clarity in notation and arithmetic accuracy. There is a general exploration of the calculations without a definitive consensus on correctness.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from the notation used in the calculations, particularly regarding the addition of terms in the denominator. There is also mention of a sanity check related to the expected behavior of gravitational potential energy with respect to changes in radius.

Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an object of mass 750 kg is lifted from the Earth's surface to a height of 6.8 x 10^6 m above its surface. Calculate the change in gravitational potential energy for the object.


The Attempt at a Solution



I used this formula ΔEg = Eg2 - Eg1
ΔEg = -(GMm/r2) - (-GMm/r1)

Eg2 = -(GMm/r2)
Eg2 = -(6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2)(5.98 x10^24kg)(750kg)/(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)
Eg2 = -2.27 x 10^10 J

Eg1 = -(GMm/r1)
Eg1 = -(6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2)(5.98 x10^24kg)(750kg)/(6.37x10^6m)
Eg1 = -4.7x 10^10 J

ΔEg = Eg2 - Eg1
ΔEg = -2.27 x 10^10 J + 4.7x 10^10 J
ΔEg = 2.43 x 10^10 J

Is my process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. But do be careful with parentheses: /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m):wink:
 
haruspex said:
Yes. But do be careful with parentheses: /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m):wink:

Is in like when I am adding them?
Are all the calculation right.. i really had trouble with them...
like adding the exponents above the 10... :frown:
 
Lolagoeslala said:
Is in like when I am adding them?
Most likely you knew what you intended when you wrote /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m), and therefore treated it as /((6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)) when you used it, but it's confusing for others (including examiners!), and might confuse you sometime.
I did a sanity check. The altitude doubled the radius, and then some, so the energy should halve, and then some - which it did.
 
haruspex said:
Most likely you knew what you intended when you wrote /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m), and therefore treated it as /((6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)) when you used it, but it's confusing for others (including examiners!), and might confuse you sometime.
I did a sanity check. The altitude doubled the radius, and then some, so the energy should halve, and then some - which it did.
so it is correct?
 
I believe so, but I did not check the arithmetic in detail.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K