Change in gravitation potential energy in space

Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an object of mass 750 kg is lifted from the Earth's surface to a height of 6.8 x 10^6 m above its surface. Calculate the change in gravitational potential energy for the object.


The Attempt at a Solution



I used this formula ΔEg = Eg2 - Eg1
ΔEg = -(GMm/r2) - (-GMm/r1)

Eg2 = -(GMm/r2)
Eg2 = -(6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2)(5.98 x10^24kg)(750kg)/(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)
Eg2 = -2.27 x 10^10 J

Eg1 = -(GMm/r1)
Eg1 = -(6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2)(5.98 x10^24kg)(750kg)/(6.37x10^6m)
Eg1 = -4.7x 10^10 J

ΔEg = Eg2 - Eg1
ΔEg = -2.27 x 10^10 J + 4.7x 10^10 J
ΔEg = 2.43 x 10^10 J

Is my process correct?
 
on Phys.org
Yes. But do be careful with parentheses: /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m):wink:
 
haruspex said:
Yes. But do be careful with parentheses: /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m):wink:

Is in like when I am adding them?
Are all the calculation right.. i really had trouble with them...
like adding the exponents above the 10... :frown:
 
Lolagoeslala said:
Is in like when I am adding them?
Most likely you knew what you intended when you wrote /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m), and therefore treated it as /((6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)) when you used it, but it's confusing for others (including examiners!), and might confuse you sometime.
I did a sanity check. The altitude doubled the radius, and then some, so the energy should halve, and then some - which it did.
 
haruspex said:
Most likely you knew what you intended when you wrote /(6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m), and therefore treated it as /((6.8x10^6m)+(6.37x10^6m)) when you used it, but it's confusing for others (including examiners!), and might confuse you sometime.
I did a sanity check. The altitude doubled the radius, and then some, so the energy should halve, and then some - which it did.
so it is correct?
 
I believe so, but I did not check the arithmetic in detail.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K