Change of variables in integrand

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proper application of change of variables in integrals, specifically transitioning from hatted to unhatted coordinates. The integral expression involving the Jacobian determinant is crucial for ensuring accurate volume element transformation. The incorrect assumption that the partial derivatives alone suffice for the transformation leads to potential overlap or underlap of volume elements. The correct formulation requires the inclusion of the Jacobian as a scale factor, ensuring the integrity of the integral across coordinate systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and coordinate transformations
  • Familiarity with Jacobian determinants in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of Einstein notation for tensor calculus
  • Basic concepts of differential forms and the Graßmann product
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Jacobian determinants in coordinate transformations
  • Learn about differential forms and their role in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the Graßmann product and its implications in geometry
  • Investigate examples of change of variables in integrals across different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced calculus, particularly those working with integrals in multiple dimensions and coordinate transformations.

Nick R
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to understand and articulate why I can't do the following. Please confirm or point out misunderstanding.

There is an integral in the "hatted" system,

[tex]\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})d\bar{x}^{1}...d\bar{x}^{n}[/tex]

I want to express this as an integral in the unhatted system. To this end, note that the following relationship is true:

[tex]d\bar{x}^{1}=\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{1}}{\partial x^{h}}dx^{h}[/tex]
(einstein notation)

So the following is true:

[tex]\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{1}}{\partial x^{h_{1}}}...\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{n}}{\partial x^{h_{n}}}dx^{h_{1}}...dx^{h_{n}}=\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})d\bar{x}^{1}...d\bar{x}^{n}[/tex]

But the LHS is not what it seems to be (it isn't an integral in unhatted coordinates...) - using a different approach the "correct" expression is

[tex]\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})\left|\frac{\partial(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})}{\partial(x^{h_{1}},...,x^{h_{n}})}\right|dx^{h_{1}}...dx^{h_{n}}=\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})d\bar{x}^{1}...d\bar{x}^{n}[/tex]

where the Jacobian is a "scale factor" to convert unhatted infintesimal volume element to hatted infintesimal volume element, obtained form the geometric interpretation of the determinate and [tex]d\bar{x}^{1}=\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{1}}{\partial x^{h}}dx^{h}[/tex]

The reason the LHS of the "first attempt" is not what it seems to be is because

A change of variables in the integrand involves changing the arrangement, size and number of volume elements. So for

[tex]\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{1}}{\partial x^{h_{1}}}...\frac{\partial\bar{x}^{n}}{\partial x^{h_{n}}}dx^{h_{1}}...dx^{h_{n}}=\int_{R}\bar{f}(\bar{x}^{1},...,\bar{x}^{n})d\bar{x}^{1}...d\bar{x}^{n}[/tex]

to be true, [tex]dx^{h_{1}},...,[/tex] and [tex]dx^{h_{n}}[/tex] have to vary spatially so that they correspond to [tex]d\bar{x}^{1}, ...,[/tex] and [tex]d\bar{x}^{n}[/tex]

Otherwise, what will effectively be happening is that volume elements will overlap (or "underlap").
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K