MHB Change the form of equation of surface

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming the equation of a surface in three-dimensional space into a standard form using symmetric matrices. The surface is initially defined by a complex equation, which is reformulated using a symmetric matrix that can be diagonalized. Participants confirm the use of the spectral theorem, noting that the orthogonal matrix simplifies the transformation process. The conversation progresses to substituting variables to express the equation in a more manageable form, ultimately leading to a representation involving squared terms. The final goal is to express the surface equation in the form of a standard quadratic equation, achieving the desired transformation successfully.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We consider the surface $S$ of the space $\mathbb{R}^3$ that is defined by the equation $2(x^2+y^2+z^2-xy-xz-yz)+3\sqrt{2}(x-z)=1$.

I want to find (using symmetric matrices) an appropriate orthonormal system of coordinates $(x_1, y_1, z_1)$ for which the above equation has the form $ax_1^2+by_1^2+cz_1^2=d$, for some $a,b,c,d\in \mathbb{R}$.
I have done the following:

The eqquation of the surface $S$ can be written in the form $$\vec{x}^T\begin{pmatrix}2 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & 2\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1$$ Since that matrix is symmetric it is diagonalizable with orthonormal basis.

Then we have to write the matrix $\begin{pmatrix}2 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & 2\end{pmatrix}$ is the form $PDP^{-1}$, or not?

What do we do next?

(Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
The eqquation of the surface $S$ can be written in the form $$\vec{x}^T\begin{pmatrix}2 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & 2\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1$$ Since that matrix is symmetric it is diagonalizable with orthonormal basis.

Then we have to write the matrix $\begin{pmatrix}2 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & 2\end{pmatrix}$ is the form $PDP^{-1}$, or not?

Hi mathmari!

Yes, and moreover $P$ is orthogonal so that $P^{-1}=P^T$ (Spectral theorem).
So we have:
$$\vec{x}^TPDP^T\vec{x}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad
(P^T\vec{x})^TD(P^T\vec{x})+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1$$
Now suppose we substitute $\vec y = P^T\vec{x}$? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Yes, and moreover $P$ is orthogonal so that $P^{-1}=P^T$ (Spectral theorem).
So we have:
$$\vec{x}^TPDP^T\vec{x}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad
(P^T\vec{x})^TD(P^T\vec{x})+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\vec{x}=1$$
Now suppose we substitute $\vec y = P^T\vec{x}$? (Wondering)

Then we get $$
\vec{y}^TD\vec{y}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}P\vec{y}=1 \ \ \ \ (\star)$$

We have the matrices \begin{equation*}P=\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix} \ \text{ and } \ D=\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 3\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}

Then we get from $(\star)$ :
\begin{align*}&\begin{pmatrix}x_1 & y_1 & z_1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x_1 \\ y_1 \\ z_1\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x_1 \\ y_1 \\ z_1\end{pmatrix}=1 \\ & \Rightarrow \begin{pmatrix}x_1 & y_1 & z_1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 3y_1 \\ 3z_1\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}3\sqrt{2} & 0 & -3\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x_1-y_1-z_1 \\ x_1+z_1 \\ x_1+y_1\end{pmatrix}=1 \\ &\Rightarrow 3y_1^2+3z_1^2+3\sqrt{2}(x_1-y_1-z_1)-3\sqrt{2}(x_1+y_1)=1 \\ & \Rightarrow 3y_1^2+3z_1^2+3\sqrt{2}x_1-3\sqrt{2}y_1-3\sqrt{2}z_1-3\sqrt{2}x_1-3\sqrt{2}y_1=1 \\ & \Rightarrow 3y_1^2+3z_1^2-6\sqrt{2}y_1-3\sqrt{2}z_1=1 \end{align*}

Is everything correct so far?

How could we continue?

(Wondering)
 
It looks correct to me.
(You substituted P instead of D though, although afterwards you did calculate as if you had substituted D.)

How about we try to write it as $3(y_1 -B)^2 + 3(z_1-C)^2 = d$? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
It looks correct to me.
(You substituted P instead of D though, although afterwards you did calculate as if you had substituted D.)

Oh yes (Blush)
I like Serena said:
How about we try to write it as $3(y_1 -B)^2 + 3(z_1-C)^2 = d$? (Wondering)

We have $$3(y_1^2 -2By_1+B^2) + 3(z_1^2-2Cz_1+C^2) = d\Rightarrow \ldots \Rightarrow 3y_1^2+3z_1^2-6By_1-6Cz_1=d-3B^2-3C^2$$
Since this has to be equal to $$3y_1^2+3z_1^2-6\sqrt{2}y_1-3\sqrt{2}z_1=1$$ we get $$B=\sqrt{2},\ C=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}, \ d=\frac{17}{2}$$ So for $$u:=y_1-\sqrt{2}, \ v:=z_1-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$$ we get $$3u^2+3v^2=\frac{17}{2}$$ Is the way correct? (Wondering)
 
Yep. It looks correct to me. (Nod)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. It looks correct to me. (Nod)

Great! Thanks a lot! (Smile)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K