Announcement Changes to politics discussion policy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Changes to the forum's politics discussion policy will prohibit political discussions outside of education and science policy, aiming to reduce divisive content. The Current News Events subforum will be removed, with threads merged into General Discussion and labeled as "News," focusing on non-political topics. A new subforum dedicated to Art, Music, History, and Linguistics will replace the Current News Events section. These changes take effect on March 12th, allowing users time to conclude existing political discussions. The goal is to foster a more productive and friendly community environment.
  • #31
haruspex said:
I agree - I should have said "decides".

The reality is that in many cases it's likely to be a judgement call from the mentors. I have no doubt that there will be cases in which it's very difficult to decide if a political discussion is permissible or runs counter to PF rules, because in many cases there will be no line that separates the science policy from the political ideology. For those concerned about this I'd say that we are also concerned and are committed to making it work as best possible, this will include talking it over amongst ourselves extensively when cases aren't clear. Luckily the mod team is pretty politically diverse, in addition to being from several different parts of the world. That diversity should keep us in check, at the very least we'll balance out each other's unintended bias. And if all else fails we're just going to have to err on the side of caution and reiterate that above all this site is a learning and teaching resource, not a general purpose forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
There seems to be a lot of confusion regarding the rule; my takeaway is basically "what subject is being discussed".

Hypothetically:
"Donald Trump is an idiot because he's a climate change skeptic"-not allowed because the subject is Donald Trump
"I read an article skeptical of climate change, what do you think of the facts stated here?"-allowed because the subject is climate change science
 
  • #33
We have rules on discussing Climate Change, the discussions have to be accepted science. But basically we can discuss climate change science if it meets the rules (posted in the Earth Forum), we just cannot discuss the politics of climate change, but it has been that way for quite a while now.
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
  • #34
I strongly support the idea that Physics Forums should be separated from any political discussion. It is a place where [we] students can find many answers, sometimes even ask one if its required and expect solid, reliable answers. Unlike Stack Exchange, this place is much more "ask nicely and you'll get a nice answer" orientated, where people actually help you instead of downvoting and/or closing your questions.

I think that this forum has a potential to become so much more. Aside from politics, science doesn't care about ideology, religious belief or nationality. Science is common contribution towards better tomorrow. On that note I would like to thank everyone who helped me, and thousands of students like myself, to comprehend, invent and develop. I hope that one day I will be capable of helping to the same extent others helped me here.

Sorry for the long post, but I had to share this. Amazing experience here, nothing but kudos to developers, administrators and users!
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and Evo
  • #35
Drakkith said:
The easiest method would probably be to just report the first post in the thread and tell us that you'd like it moved to the new subforum. That way Evo isn't bombarded with requests and it ensures things happen in a timely manner if Evo leaves to go to a vacation in Hawaii or something. :wink:
What ? No, wait ... Evo cannot go on vacation. We need her here !
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
  • #36
The change is now complete.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
22K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K