Changing the summation indexes in double sums.

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the variable switch in double summations involving binomial coefficients, specifically transitioning from the expression \(\sum_{i=0}^n\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{j}x^{i+j}\) to \(\sum_{k=0}^{n+m}\sum_{i=0}^k\binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{k-i}x^{k}\). The key method for proving the correctness of this transformation lies in matching coefficients of the polynomial in \(x\). The coefficients for \(x^h\) on both sides are shown to be equal, confirming the validity of the switch.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial coefficients and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial expressions and coefficient matching
  • Knowledge of summation notation and manipulation techniques
  • Basic combinatorial identities and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of binomial coefficients in depth
  • Learn about polynomial identity proofs and techniques
  • Explore advanced combinatorial identities and their proofs
  • Investigate generating functions as a method for summation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorics, and anyone interested in advanced polynomial manipulation and proof techniques.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I have just made the following variable switch:

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^n\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{ j}x^{i+j}=\sum_{k=0}^{n+m}\sum_{i=0}^k\binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{k-i}x^{k}[/tex]

I know it's right, but is there a method I can use to prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They're both polynomials in x, just match up coefficients. For 0 < h < n+m, the coefficient of xh on the right is:

[tex]\sum _{i=0} ^h \binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{h-i}[/tex]

On the left, it's:

[tex]\sum _{i=0} ^n \binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{h-i}[/tex]

but [itex]\binom{m}{h-i}[/itex] is zero when i > h, so the above is really equal to:

[tex]\sum _{i=0} ^h \binom{n}{i}\binom{m}{h-i}[/tex]

which we've already seen to be the coefficient on the left side.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K