Why Does the Delta Potential Only Allow a Single Negative Energy State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mielgosez
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on problem 1.4 from Cohen Tannoudji, which involves finding the Fourier transform of a wave function under the potential -αδ(x). The Schrödinger equation is utilized: -ℏ²/2m d²/dx² ψ(x) - αδ(x)ψ(x) = E ψ(x). The analysis reveals that only one negative energy state is possible due to the divergence of the equation when E equals the potential energy for x ≠ 0, indicating that only the bound state of the particle is identified through this method, excluding propagating states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of delta functions and their properties
  • Concept of bound and unbound states in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of delta potentials in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of bound states and their significance
  • Explore advanced Fourier transform techniques in quantum wave functions
  • Investigate the role of negative energy states in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on wave functions, potential theory, and the analysis of bound states in quantum systems.

mielgosez
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


problem 1.4 of Cohen Tannoudji:
The exercise is divided into two parts:
THE FIRST ONE (part a.) asks to find the Fourier transform of a wave function when the potential is: -αδ(x). In terms of p, E, alpha and ψ(0)
and
ask to “show that only one value of E, a negative one, is possible” Furthermore, they claim that “Only the bound state of the particle, and not the ones in which it propagates, is found by this method; why?”


Homework Equations



the Schrödinger equation:
-ℏ^2/2m d^2/〖dx〗^2 ψ(x)-αδ(x)ψ(x)=E ψ(x)


The Attempt at a Solution


Hi, I was solving the problem 1.4 of Cohen Tannoudji:
The exercise is divided into two parts:
THE FIRST ONE (part a.) asks to find the Fourier transform of a wave function when the potential is: -αδ(x). In terms of p, E, alpha and ψ(0)
I did the next procedure:
I wrote down the Schrödinger equation:
-ℏ^2/2m d^2/〖dx〗^2 ψ(x)-αδ(x)ψ(x)=E ψ(x) …………………………………………………………………… (i)

Then, I applied a Fourier Transform over the equation (i) What I got was:
-ℏ^2/2m 〖(ik)〗^2 ψ ̅(k)-αψ(0)=E ψ ̅(k)………………………………………………………………………….(ii)
Finally, I express ψ ̅(k) in terms of the given parameters, using the fact that p=ℏk
ψ ̅(k)=(α ψ(0))/(p^2/2m-E)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………(iii)
Now, they ask to “show that only one value of E, a negative one, is possible” Furthermore, they claim that “Only the bound state of the particle, and not the ones in which it propagates, is found by this method; why?”
What I know is that as E=V(r)+p^2/2m and for x≠0 V(r)=0, then equation (iii) diverge. But, I don’t get why there’s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mielgosez said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi, I was solving the problem 1.4 of Cohen Tannoudji:
The exercise is divided into two parts:
THE FIRST ONE (part a.) asks to find the Fourier transform of a wave function when the potential is: -αδ(x). In terms of p, E, alpha and ψ(0)
I did the next procedure:
I wrote down the Schrödinger equation:
-ℏ^2/2m d^2/〖dx〗^2 ψ(x)-αδ(x)ψ(x)=E ψ(x) …………………………………………………………………… (i)

Then, I applied a Fourier Transform over the equation (i) What I got was:
-ℏ^2/2m 〖(ik)〗^2 ψ ̅(k)-αψ(0)=E ψ ̅(k)………………………………………………………………………….(ii)
You have to take care with the constants. The Fourier transform of the potential term is
-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \alpha\delta(x)\psi(x)e^{-ikx}\,dkNote also that your method will give you \bar{\varphi}(k), not \bar{\varphi}(p).
Finally, I express ψ ̅(k) in terms of the given parameters, using the fact that p=ℏk
ψ ̅(k)=(α ψ(0))/(p^2/2m-E)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………(iii)
Now, they ask to “show that only one value of E, a negative one, is possible”
Use the fact that
\varphi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \bar{\varphi}(p)e^{ipx/\hbar}\,dpto calculate \varphi(0).
Furthermore, they claim that “Only the bound state of the particle, and not the ones in which it propagates, is found by this method; why?”
What I know is that as E=V(r)+p^2/2m and for x≠0 V(r)=0, then equation (iii) diverge. But, I don’t get why there’s
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K