Charge distribution in concentric shells

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid conducting sphere and a concentric conducting spherical shell, with specified charges and radii. The objective is to determine the electric field at a specific radial distance from the center of the configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the behavior of charges in conductors and the implications for electric fields within and around them. There is a focus on the application of Gauss's Law and the concept of charge distribution on the surfaces of the conductors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the implications of the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the conductors. Some participants are questioning the assumptions about charge distribution and the resulting electric field, while others are clarifying the conditions under which the electric field is zero within a conductor.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the charge distribution on the inner surface of the outer shell and the overall charge balance of the system. Participants are also addressing the need for accurate diagrams to represent the charge distribution.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A solid conducting sphere of radius 2.00 cm has a charge 16.00 µC. A conducting spherical shell of inner radius 4.00 cm and outer radius 5.00 cm is concentric with the solid sphere and has a total charge of -3.00 µC. (Take radially outward as the positive direction.)
Find the electric field at r = 4.50 cm from the center of this charge configuration.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think there's something wrong with my physical picture. So before I get into any calculations, this is what I'm thinking.

physics.png


Since they are conductors the charge can move around. The inner sphere is positive so it will attract the negative charges from the outside of the outer sphere to the inside, leaving the outside of the outer sphere positive.
Therefore, the net charge within the enclosed Gaussian should be Qin=+13μC.

However, that doesn't seem to yield the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the question states that the outer shell is conducting ? If yes , then the answer is pretty simple . What is the electric field inside a conductor ?
 
Yes I'm sure.

It's 0 inside a conductor. But the Gaussian is also surrounding the smaller conducting sphere, that should account for some field?
 
Yes, all the way to the inner radius of the outer shell, where you have correctly drawn a bunch of +++ ! Just a skin depth into the outer shell the field really is 0 (otherwise more charges would move until it is).
 
Wait, I didn't understand that. Can you explain again?
 
Feodalherren said:
Yes I'm sure.

It's 0 inside a conductor. But the Gaussian is also surrounding the smaller conducting sphere, that should account for some field?

The diagram you have made has incorrect amount of negative charge -3.00 µC on the inner surface of outer shell .

If you know electric field is zero within the conductor then you are done with the problem .

Even if you wish to apply Gauss Law to this problem ,you need to use the fact that electric field inside a conductor is 0 .

Take a gaussian sphere of radius 'r' , 4<r<5 .Since E = 0 , ∫E.ds = 0 which as per Gauss Law implies charge enclosed in the gaussian sphere is 0 .This in turn means that the charge enclosed on the inner surface of the outer shell is -16µC .The charge on the outer surface of outer shell will be 13 µC ,such that the net charge on the outer shell is -3.00 µC .The electric field lines from the outer shell are radially outwards .

The electric field lines originate from the outer surface of inner sphere and terminate at the inner surface of outer shell such that the electric field at r , 4<r<5 is zero .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
BvU said:
... have correctly drawn a bunch of +++ ! ..
Sorry, that was a bunch of --- (I didn't look at the number -3, but Tanya handled that, and the remainder excellently).
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K