Charge of q Problem: Find q from Two 3.0g Spheres on 1.0m Threads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mindscrape
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge (q) of two 3.0 g spheres suspended on 1.0 m threads that repel each other after being equally charged. The user initially miscalculated the charge using the formula q = √(mg tan(θ) 2x² / k), resulting in an unreasonably high value of 6.17 x 10¹³ C. After recognizing a calculation error related to unit conversion, the user corrected the charge to 7.46 x 10⁻⁷ C, realizing that the problem required the answer in nanocoulombs (nC) instead of coulombs (C).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electrostatic force calculations
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of unit conversions, specifically between coulombs and nanocoulombs
  • Basic principles of tension in physics and its role in force analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Study the principles of tension in strings and its relation to forces in equilibrium
  • Learn about unit conversions, particularly between different scales of charge (C to nC)
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their use in solving physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics and force analysis, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to charged particles and their interactions.

Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
Two 3.0 g spheres on 1.0-m-long threads repel each other after being equally charged. What is the charge of q?

I don't know why I can't seem to get this right, but I am missing something somewhere. So, I figured I could find use the tension in the 1m string to find the horizontal component of the force, which would then equal the force of the repulsion between the charges. Which means that T_x = m g tan \theta. Also using trig to find the x leg yields .324m. If F = \frac{kq^2}{r^2} then q should be q = \sqrt{\frac{mgtan\theta 2x^2}{k}}, and plugging in the numbers would be q = \sqrt{\frac{.003kg*9.8\frac{m}{s^2}*tan(20)*.684^2m}{(9*10^9\frac{Nm^2}{C^2})}}. But that gives that q=6.17*10^13C, which would be ripping atoms in air apart. Anyone chatch were I went wrong?
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_25_60.jpg
    knight_Figure_25_60.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 449
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh whoops, I just figured out what I did wrong. Usually instead of using division on my calculator I just tpye ^-1, but I forgot to. Nevermind, I was right.
 
I worked this one out on my own and ended up with:

<br /> q = \sqrt{\frac{.003kg*9.8\frac{m}{s^2}*tan(20)*(2sin(20))^2 m}{(9*10^9\frac{Nm^2}{C^2})}}<br />

(Which, as far as I can tell, is identical to the one above.)

It gives me an answer of 7.46*10^-7... which is apparently incorrect. What am I missing here? I keep coming up with the same equation no matter how I approach the problem. This is super frustrating.
 
Er... nevermind. I finally realized it was asking for nC - not C. Big difference in numbers there. :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
863
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K