Charge Sphere Radiation & E Field: Griffiths Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Radiation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
In Griffiths he talks about a charged sphere and that if it pulsed in an out i would not radiate.
He says if you draw a Gaussian surface around it the E field doesn't change, as long as you are outside of it. But wouldn't the charges accelerate and you would think they would radiate. But maybe the field cancels in a way as to prevent this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cragar! :smile:

if the sphere is always spherically symmetric, then so must its field be …

so if you draw a big sphere round it, the flux density across it must be uniform (at any time) …

since the total flux (at any time) must be zero (Gauss' Law), that means the uniform flux density (at any time) must be zero, ie no flux :wink:

if, alternatively, the sphere has a dipole pulsation, then again the total flux will be zero, but now the flux density will be non-uniform, so there can (and will) be a flux

(same for an accelerating charge … total flux zero, flux density non-uniform and non-zero)​
 
tiny-tim said:
if, alternatively, the sphere has a dipole pulsation, then again the total flux will be zero, but now the flux density will be non-uniform, so there can (and will) be a flux​


...inwards at some locations on the sphere and outwards at other locations.

(Just to expand your statement a bit. I know from experience that some students need to be reminded that "total flux = 0" is not the same thing as "flux = 0 everywhere".)​
 
ok thanks for your answers