Charged particle in centre of equilateral triangle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three charged particles located at the corners of an equilateral triangle, each with a charge of ##q_1=q_2=q_3=4*10^{-6} C##. A fourth particle with charge ##q_4=3*10^{-4} C## is positioned at the intersection of the triangle's bisectors. The distance between the first charged particle and the fourth is given as 3.46 cm. The main question revolves around determining the net force acting on the fourth particle.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of forces acting on the fourth particle and express confusion regarding the expected symmetry leading to a net force of zero. There are attempts to break down the forces into components and to sum them vectorially.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on expressing the forces in rectangular coordinates and suggested checking the vector components. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or resolution of the confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of symmetry in the system and the correct application of vector addition for forces. There is an indication that some calculations may have been misinterpreted or incorrectly executed, but specifics remain unresolved.

prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


3 charged particles located at equilateral triangles corners has charge ##q_1=q_2=q_2=4*10^{-6} C ## The 4th particle with charge ## q_4=3*10^{-4}## is placed at bisectors crossing. The distance between q1 and q4 is 3.46 cm .What is the net force on q4?
trijsturis.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So I calculated the forces ## F_{43} =F_{42}=F_{41}= (k q_1 q_2 )/ r^2 =9kN ##
Next I thought I calculate the F* and sum of ## F_{41} and F* ##
##F*=F^*_{43} +F^*_{42}=F_{43}/cos(60)+F_{42}/cos(60)= 36kN##

Now when i add up ##F* +F_{41}=27kN## Its getting confusing , because I was certain that sum of all forces on q4 should be zero,because of the symmetry and q1=q2=q3.

My question to you guys is, is my calculation wrong or the sum of all forces should not be zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prehisto said:

Homework Statement


3 charged particles located at equilateral triangles corners has charge ##q_1=q_2=q_2=4*10^{-6} C ## The 4th particle with charge ## q_4=3*10^{-4}## is placed at bisectors crossing. The distance between q1 and q4 is 3.46 cm .What is the net force on q4?
trijsturis.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So I calculated the forces ## F_{43} =F_{42}=F_{41}= (k q_1 q_2 )/ r^2 =9kN ##
Next I thought I calculate the F* and sum of ## F_{41} and F* ##
##F*=F^*_{43} +F^*_{42}=F_{43}/cos(60)+F_{42}/cos(60)= 36kN##

Now when i add up ##F* +F_{41}=27kN## Its getting confusing , because I was certain that sum of all forces on q4 should be zero,because of the symmetry and q1=q2=q3.

My question to you guys is, is my calculation wrong or the sum of all forces should not be zero?
I think the sum should be zero, but you need to show the vector sum of the vector forces to show it. Use rectangular coordinates to write the equations... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Use rectangular coordinates to write the equations... :smile:
Thank you for responding.

But i think I am did exactly that. If we imagine that direction from q4 to q1 ir positive axis direction . I projected two vectors to x-axis and added them up, then subtracted the third.
 
prehisto said:
Thank you for responding.

But i think I am did exactly that. If we imagine that direction from q4 to q1 ir positive axis direction . I projected two vectors to x-axis and added them up, then subtracted the third.
I guess the way you wrote it is not intuitive for me, and doesn't appear to show the forces in both the x and y directions. I was looking for something more like this:

ΣFx = Fx14 + Fx24 + Fx34

ΣFy = Fy14 + Fy24 + Fy34

Can you express your work more in that format? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Can you express your work more in that format? :smile:

##Fx=Fx_{14} +Fx_{24}+Fx_{34}=F_{14}/cos(60)+F_{24}/cos(60)+Fx_{34}= 18+18-9=27kN##
##Fy=Fy_{14} +Fy_{24}+Fy_{34}=F_{14}*cos(90)+F_{24}*cos(30)+F_{34}*cos(30)= 0+7,24+7,24=15,48kN##
looking at the final values,looks like something is terribly wrong , but i don't see it :(
 
prehisto said:
##Fx=Fx_{14} +Fx_{24}+Fx_{34}=F_{14}/cos(60)+F_{24}/cos(60)+Fx_{34}= 18+18-9=27kN##
##Fy=Fy_{14} +Fy_{24}+Fy_{34}=F_{14}*cos(90)+F_{24}*cos(30)+F_{34}*cos(30)= 0+7,24+7,24=15,48kN##
looking at the final values,looks like something is terribly wrong , but i don't see it :(
In the x-direction, Fx14 is zero, right? And Fx24 and Fx34 should be the same, differing only by their signs... And so on...
 
berkeman said:
n the x-direction, Fx14 is zero, right? And Fx24 and Fx34 should be the same, differing only by their signs... And so on...

jess! I completely messed up there, i need to get some sleep :D.
Thank you!
 
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
39K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K