Charged particle in centre of equilateral triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the net force acting on a charged particle (q4) placed at the bisector crossing of an equilateral triangle formed by three other charged particles (q1, q2, q3). The charges are q1 = q2 = q3 = 4 × 10-6 C and q4 = 3 × 10-4 C, with a distance of 3.46 cm between q1 and q4. Initial calculations yielded forces of 9 kN for each interaction, leading to confusion regarding the expected net force due to symmetry. Participants emphasized the importance of vector summation in both x and y directions to resolve the apparent discrepancy in force calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law for electric forces
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems for force resolution
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and charge interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Study vector decomposition and addition in two dimensions
  • Learn about electric field concepts and their relation to forces on charges
  • Explore symmetry in electrostatic systems and its implications on net forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric forces and charge interactions in a triangular configuration.

prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


3 charged particles located at equilateral triangles corners has charge ##q_1=q_2=q_2=4*10^{-6} C ## The 4th particle with charge ## q_4=3*10^{-4}## is placed at bisectors crossing. The distance between q1 and q4 is 3.46 cm .What is the net force on q4?
trijsturis.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So I calculated the forces ## F_{43} =F_{42}=F_{41}= (k q_1 q_2 )/ r^2 =9kN ##
Next I thought I calculate the F* and sum of ## F_{41} and F* ##
##F*=F^*_{43} +F^*_{42}=F_{43}/cos(60)+F_{42}/cos(60)= 36kN##

Now when i add up ##F* +F_{41}=27kN## Its getting confusing , because I was certain that sum of all forces on q4 should be zero,because of the symmetry and q1=q2=q3.

My question to you guys is, is my calculation wrong or the sum of all forces should not be zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prehisto said:

Homework Statement


3 charged particles located at equilateral triangles corners has charge ##q_1=q_2=q_2=4*10^{-6} C ## The 4th particle with charge ## q_4=3*10^{-4}## is placed at bisectors crossing. The distance between q1 and q4 is 3.46 cm .What is the net force on q4?
trijsturis.png


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


So I calculated the forces ## F_{43} =F_{42}=F_{41}= (k q_1 q_2 )/ r^2 =9kN ##
Next I thought I calculate the F* and sum of ## F_{41} and F* ##
##F*=F^*_{43} +F^*_{42}=F_{43}/cos(60)+F_{42}/cos(60)= 36kN##

Now when i add up ##F* +F_{41}=27kN## Its getting confusing , because I was certain that sum of all forces on q4 should be zero,because of the symmetry and q1=q2=q3.

My question to you guys is, is my calculation wrong or the sum of all forces should not be zero?
I think the sum should be zero, but you need to show the vector sum of the vector forces to show it. Use rectangular coordinates to write the equations... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Use rectangular coordinates to write the equations... :smile:
Thank you for responding.

But i think I am did exactly that. If we imagine that direction from q4 to q1 ir positive axis direction . I projected two vectors to x-axis and added them up, then subtracted the third.
 
prehisto said:
Thank you for responding.

But i think I am did exactly that. If we imagine that direction from q4 to q1 ir positive axis direction . I projected two vectors to x-axis and added them up, then subtracted the third.
I guess the way you wrote it is not intuitive for me, and doesn't appear to show the forces in both the x and y directions. I was looking for something more like this:

ΣFx = Fx14 + Fx24 + Fx34

ΣFy = Fy14 + Fy24 + Fy34

Can you express your work more in that format? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Can you express your work more in that format? :smile:

##Fx=Fx_{14} +Fx_{24}+Fx_{34}=F_{14}/cos(60)+F_{24}/cos(60)+Fx_{34}= 18+18-9=27kN##
##Fy=Fy_{14} +Fy_{24}+Fy_{34}=F_{14}*cos(90)+F_{24}*cos(30)+F_{34}*cos(30)= 0+7,24+7,24=15,48kN##
looking at the final values,looks like something is terribly wrong , but i don't see it :(
 
prehisto said:
##Fx=Fx_{14} +Fx_{24}+Fx_{34}=F_{14}/cos(60)+F_{24}/cos(60)+Fx_{34}= 18+18-9=27kN##
##Fy=Fy_{14} +Fy_{24}+Fy_{34}=F_{14}*cos(90)+F_{24}*cos(30)+F_{34}*cos(30)= 0+7,24+7,24=15,48kN##
looking at the final values,looks like something is terribly wrong , but i don't see it :(
In the x-direction, Fx14 is zero, right? And Fx24 and Fx34 should be the same, differing only by their signs... And so on...
 
berkeman said:
n the x-direction, Fx14 is zero, right? And Fx24 and Fx34 should be the same, differing only by their signs... And so on...

jess! I completely messed up there, i need to get some sleep :D.
Thank you!
 
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
38K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K