Charged Particle Moving in a Magnetic Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a charged particle moving in a magnetic field, specifically addressing the relationship between kinetic energy, speed, radius of the trajectory, and the period of motion. Participants are examining how these factors interact and the implications of a problem statement from a physics textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the problem statement regarding the "same initial path" and how it relates to changes in speed and radius. There is a focus on reconciling the period of motion with the kinetic energy and speed of the particle.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made in the problem statement and discussing the relationships between speed, radius, and period. Some guidance is offered regarding the gyrofrequency and its relevance to the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of the path described.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement specifies the particle returns along the same initial path, leading to confusion about the implications for speed and trajectory. There is also mention of potential discrepancies in the interpretation of "initial path" versus "return path."

Farina
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello. Can you please check out the attachment?

Solving (a) is easy. The correct answer to (b) is "the period for the return trip is unchanged" (that is, T = 130 ns).

Okay, fine: the attachment shows why T only depends on m, q, and B.

How on Earth, though, do you reconcile this with the inverse relationship between velocity and period, given the initial and return arc radius values are the same?

In other words, if KE is doubled, the speed increases, and (again for a constant radius) the period must DECREASE!

What am I missing? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    50.4 KB · Views: 570
Physics news on Phys.org
If the speed of a charged particle in a magnetic field increases, the radius of the circular trajectory also increases. If the speed doubles the radius and so the circumference of the circle doubles and the time remains constant.
 
Thank you!

And, right, that's the rub... the problem statement (taken from Halliday & Resnick) specified:

"If the particle is sent back though the magnetic field (along the same initial path)..."

My guess this "same initial path" specification is incorrect.

HallsofIvy said:
If the speed of a charged particle in a magnetic field increases, the radius of the circular trajectory also increases. If the speed doubles the radius and so the circumference of the circle doubles and the time remains constant.
 
Why is that? The same initial path is the downward arrow on the right. It goes that way once, then again with twice the energy.
 
Twice the energy means 1.4 times the speed, which means a 1.4 times greater radius for a given period, T.
 
Ok, is there a problem with that? I have not checked your numbers, but assume that you did it fine. Note that the path through the magnetic field is not the initial path. Is that what is tripping you up?
 
The stated problem text said: "... along the same initial path" which I take to mean the initial path and return path are one and the same?

ModusPwnd said:
Ok, is there a problem with that? I have not checked your numbers, but assume that you did it fine. Note that the path through the magnetic field is not the initial path. Is that what is tripping you up?
 
lol, why would you take it like that? Initial path means initial path, the path the on the right. Initial doesn't mean initial and return...
 
It is better learning to work it out as you have, but you could also get the answer from the equation for the gyrofrequency (or cyclotron frequency).
from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotron_resonance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroradius

The gyrofrequency is the (angular) frequency for full revolution, but your problem is half a circle, so you should be able to see that it is just double the frequency. And you can take the inverse to get period. It doesn't depend on velocity at all since the velocity cancels out (in the nonrelativistic regime).
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
965
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K