Charts on Topological Manifolds - Simple Notational Issue

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notational clarification of charts in the context of differential topology, specifically referencing "An Introduction to Differential Topology" by Dennis Barden and Charles Thomas. The user, Peter, seeks to understand the distinction between M and M^m as defined in Definition 1.1.3. It is established that M^m indicates that the manifold M is of m dimensions, and that M is used when the dimension does not need to be emphasized. The notation aligns with the understanding that the coordinates are in ℝ^m, where m represents the number of coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with differential topology concepts
  • Understanding of manifold theory
  • Knowledge of Euclidean space notation
  • Basic comprehension of differentiable maps
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of differentiable manifolds in detail
  • Explore the implications of dimensionality in manifold theory
  • Learn about the relationship between manifolds and Euclidean spaces
  • Review additional resources on notation in differential topology
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential topology, as well as educators seeking to clarify notational conventions in teaching these concepts.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "An Introduction to Differential Topology" by Dennis Barden and Charles Thomas ...

I am focussed on Chapter 1: Differential Manifolds and Differentiable Maps ...

I need some help and clarification on an apparently simple notational issue regarding the definition of a chart (Definition 1.1.3) ...

Definition 1.1.3 reads as follows:
?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png
My question regarding this definition is as follows:

What is the meaning of M and how does it differ from M^m?

Surely the relationship between M and M^m is not the same as the relationship between R and R^m ... ?

I am not even sure what M is ... ?

Can someone clarify the above issue for me ...?

Hope someone can help ...

Peter===========================================================

So that readers can understand the context and notation of Barden and Thomas, I am providing the pages of the text leading up to and including the definition referred to above ... ... as follows ... ...
?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png

?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png

?temp_hash=df27f89f2e21dffb8b683d0466b294ab.png
 

Attachments

  • Barden & Thomas - Definition 1.1.3 - Chart ... .png
    Barden & Thomas - Definition 1.1.3 - Chart ... .png
    17.8 KB · Views: 859
  • Barden & Thomas - 1 - Ch 1 - page 1.png
    Barden & Thomas - 1 - Ch 1 - page 1.png
    36.3 KB · Views: 816
  • Barden & Thomas - 2 - Ch 1 - page 2     .png
    Barden & Thomas - 2 - Ch 1 - page 2 .png
    40.5 KB · Views: 827
  • Barden & Thomas - 3 - Ch 1 - page 3     .png
    Barden & Thomas - 3 - Ch 1 - page 3 .png
    47 KB · Views: 656
Physics news on Phys.org
##M^m## is just a reminder that the manifold ##M## is of ##m## dimensions. So ##M^m = M##.
I have never seen such a notation but it's clear from definition 1.1.1. It only symbolizes that the (Euclidean) coordinates are in ##ℝ^m##, i.e. there are ##m## coordinates. I guess the author drops the ##m## in ##M^m## and sticks with ##M## when he doesn't need to emphasize the dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks fresh_42 ... appreciate the help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K