Chemical Engineering vs. Electrical Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between pursuing a career in Chemical Engineering (ChemE) versus Electrical Engineering (EE). Participants explore the distinctions between the two fields, their respective job prospects, and personal interests in relation to each discipline.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that ChemE often leads to process engineering roles, which may involve more general engineering and thermodynamics than chemistry itself.
  • Others argue that EE is more applicable to technology and personal life, emphasizing its relevance in electronics and communications systems.
  • A participant suggests that the choice between the two fields could be simplified by considering a preference for physics over chemistry, as EE relies heavily on physics.
  • One participant highlights that many ChemE graduates may end up in roles that do not heavily utilize chemistry, such as meter reading or fabrication, which may align more with materials science.
  • Another participant expresses interest in specific areas within ChemE, such as energy, nanotechnology, biotechnology, and materials, and seeks examples of tasks and tools used in the field.
  • A participant who identifies as a chemist questions the specifics of nanotechnology and biotechnology applications within ChemE, indicating a need for clarity on the roles and responsibilities in those areas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the merits of each engineering discipline, with no clear consensus on which field is superior. Some emphasize the applicability of EE, while others highlight the interesting aspects of ChemE. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which career path is definitively better.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various topics and classes relevant to ChemE, such as separations, fluid dynamics, and reactor design, but do not reach a unified understanding of how these relate to career outcomes. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific applications of ChemE in industries like petroleum and biotechnology.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career in engineering, particularly those weighing the options between Chemical Engineering and Electrical Engineering, may find this discussion relevant.

hooskup
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am very new to the forums, and I ran across another form discussing these two topics; however the previous thread was mainly discussing nanotechnology. I am interested to find out which carrier I should pursue: chemical eng. or Elec. Eng.?

I am extremely interested in both, although I can't quite chose. Can you help me distinguish between the two, and which do you feel is a better carrier?

Any thoughts would be appreciated,
~h
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am a sophomore in ChemE. I am taking an elective in EE and for a while I was strongly considering changing my major to EE or software engineering.

In what I have seen, the overwhelming majority of jobs for cheme grads is process engineering. You will probably use general engineering and thermodynamics more than the purported chemistry and biology. However, it is a good career.

If you are interested in Technology, meaning the functioning of electronics, computers, communications systems, then go with EE. This is the only reason why I considered changing majors. What you learn in ChemE is interesting, but not very applicable to your personal life. EE is very applicable and useful, in my opinion.

For you, the better career is the one that interests you most. They both pay well and offer good prospects for advancement.

Also, if you are equally interested in chemistry and electronics, then go with EE. This is because you don't necessarily do much with chemistry in chemical engineering.

The reason I decided to stay in ChemE was because I want to do research and will probably go to graduate school rather than working as a process engineer in a plant.
 
hooskup said:
Hello,

I am very new to the forums, and I ran across another form discussing these two topics; however the previous thread was mainly discussing nanotechnology. I am interested to find out which carrier I should pursue: chemical eng. or Elec. Eng.?

I am extremely interested in both, although I can't quite chose. Can you help me distinguish between the two, and which do you feel is a better carrier?

Any thoughts would be appreciated,
~h

This might be a stupid comment to make, but perhaps the decision can be narrowed down in a simple way.

Do you have a strong preference for physics over chemistry, or vice versa. If so, make the choice based on that. EE uses much physics and very little chemistry.
 
kakyamer said:
I am a sophomore in ChemE. I am taking an elective in EE and for a while I was strongly considering changing my major to EE or software engineering.

In what I have seen, the overwhelming majority of jobs for cheme grads is process engineering. You will probably use general engineering and thermodynamics more than the purported chemistry and biology. However, it is a good career.

If you are interested in Technology, meaning the functioning of electronics, computers, communications systems, then go with EE. This is the only reason why I considered changing majors. What you learn in ChemE is interesting, but not very applicable to your personal life. EE is very applicable and useful, in my opinion.

For you, the better career is the one that interests you most. They both pay well and offer good prospects for advancement.

Also, if you are equally interested in chemistry and electronics, then go with EE. This is because you don't necessarily do much with chemistry in chemical engineering.

The reason I decided to stay in ChemE was because I want to do research and will probably go to graduate school rather than working as a process engineer in a plant.

Thanks for this post. Can you give us more details about chemical engineering? Thanks.
 
chemical engr has actually little to do with chemistry. as the above poster noted, you are more likely a process engr. some people get jobs being meter readers coming out of college. some chemical engrs do more fabrication and stuff (thats pushing more towards mat sci, but everyone plays in mat sci so whatever).

have you sat down and looked at the classes you need to take as a chemical engr?
separations, fluid dynamics, heat transfer/thermodynamics, reactor design, control systems, etc.
it overlaps a lot more with mech e rather than chemistry.

try finding out what topics/aspect of those topics interest you. labels (aka majors) don't mean much if you have the know-how.
don't believe me? the last two Nobel prizes in Chemistry were for RNA structure and fluorescent proteins. before that, it was surface chemistry. back in 1998, it was for density function theory... something that's more along the lines of theoretical physics. chemistry in particular is a telling example, as it is a central science, but the general idea holds more than you would think.
 
Thanks for the information, flemmyd. The topics that interest me in chemical engineering are energy, nanotech, biotech, and materials. May I trouble you for some examples of tasks performed by chem engineers as well as the tools they use, mathematical techniques utilized, and other pertinent information?
 
Honestly, I'm not an engineer. I'm a chemist (hoping to add physicists, formally an engineer). I'm sure other people can give you a better answer.

first, elaborate a little.
nanotech: the large scale fabrication? if you do synthesis, you might actually be a bit of a pure chemist.
biotech: like developing prosthetic parts and what not? or like genetic engr and stuff?
materials: really more of something that you work with to get you desired area:
(for example: you're engine needs blah blah heat properties and can only be so dense due to weight. what material do you use?)
 
Great replies, I thank all of you.

I think for now I'm going to continue ChemE because I'm interested in working in the petroleum industry; although many good points were made in this thread, I may actually go after EE eventually... I don't know; I guess I'll just keep pushing forward and see where I end up.

Thanks again for all the insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K