Engineering Degrees and Job Prospects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for selecting an engineering degree at UT Austin, specifically between Mechanical, Chemical, and Electrical Engineering. Participants explore job prospects, personal interests, and the relevance of each field to various industries, including renewable energy and advanced technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about sticking with Mechanical Engineering, considering Chemical and Electrical Engineering as alternatives based on career diversity and job prospects.
  • Concerns are raised about the perceived job market limitations for Chemical Engineers, particularly being confined to the chemical and biotech industries.
  • The Electrical Engineering program is noted for its concentrations in Nanotechnology, Power Engineering, and software engineering, but it is mentioned that it may offer less breadth compared to Mechanical or Chemical Engineering.
  • Mechanical Engineering is highlighted for its strong job prospects and relevant courses in Material Science and Thermal-fluid systems, though it lacks in modern physics and computer science offerings.
  • One participant suggests deferring decisions until after experiencing lower-division courses, as personal enjoyment of the subjects may be a better indicator of fit than job forecasts.
  • Another participant points out the restrictive nature of course selection at UT Austin, which may influence the decision on which engineering path to pursue.
  • A request is made for insights on which degree might be more relevant to specific interests such as Solar Energy, Rocket Propulsion, and Artificial Intelligence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both Mechanical and Electrical Engineering have good job prospects, but there is no consensus on which degree is more relevant to the individual's specific interests or which path to choose.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying opinions on the importance of job market forecasts and personal interest in coursework, with no definitive conclusions reached regarding the best engineering path.

UMath1
Messages
361
Reaction score
9
I have been accepted to the UT Austin Cockrell School of Engineering for Mechanical Engineering in Fall 2017. I'll be starting as a sophomore because I have finished all my general education requirements. However, I am not entirely sure I want to stick to MechE. I have been considering Chemical and Electrical Engineering as alternatives.

Some things I want from my degree:
-diverse array of available careers
-solid job prospects
-opportunity to work in renewable industry
-opportunity to research material science and nuclear fusion
-opportunity to study modern Physics and Computer Science

Looking at the course catalogs, the most attractive and interesting to me was Chemical Engineering but I didn't pick it because I have found that jobs for ChemEs are essentially constrained to the chemical and biotech industries. If this isn't true, please tell me.

The Electrical Engineering program at UT would allow me to take concentrations in Nanotechnology (which includes modern Physics), Power Engineering (relevant to renewables), and software engineering (CS). Only issue is that the breadth is much less than MechE or ChemE and BLS reports that there is 0% projected growth for EEs in period 2014-2024.

Mechanical Engineering includes courses in Material Science and Thermal-fluid systems (relevant to renewables) but it barely has any courses in modern physics or CS. However, the job prospects appear to be the best (5% projected growth according BLS).

I am not sure how to weigh these pros and cons. If you have any additional insights let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you assessed your situation fine; for your interests, both mechanical or electrical would be fine, and while they vary by specific job, the prospects tend to be good.
 
I would defer any decisions until you've had some classes. People generally enjoy their mechanical engineer lower-division courses (e.g. statics, thermodynamics) and hate the electrical (electric circuits, signals and systems) or vice versa. I think that is a much better guide to which path you should follow than abstract musings about potential jobs.

I wouldn't base any decision at all on BLS forecasts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and russ_watters
Thats true. However, UT Austin, the college where I am going to is very restrictive when it comes to allowing students to take courses outside their major.

I think it might help if someone could tell me which degree, Electrical or Mechanical, is more needed and more relevant to each of my interests:

-Solar Energy
-Rocket Propulsion
-Nuclear Fusion/Plasma Physics
-Astrophysics
-Nanotechnology
-Electric Vehicles
-Remanufacturing/Making the transition to circular economy
-Artificial Intelligence
-Biotechnology/Engineering Living Matter
-Wind/Hydropower

Then I can go with the one that's relevant to the majority of them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K