Chemical Exposure: Worried About Cancer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stadtjunky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around concerns regarding potential cancer risks associated with exposure to methyl iodide (MeI) and dichloromethane (DCM) in a laboratory setting. Participants share personal experiences, safety practices, and varying opinions on the severity of the exposure and its implications for health.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • John expresses concern about cancer risk after a spill of methyl iodide, despite wearing nitrile gloves, which he believes may not have provided adequate protection.
  • Some participants note that nitrile gloves are not effective against DCM, suggesting that alternative protective equipment should be used.
  • There is a discussion about the classification of methyl iodide as a suspected human carcinogen, with references to different safety standards and classifications.
  • Several participants argue that accidental and temporary exposure to small amounts of chemicals like methyl iodide is generally not dangerous, emphasizing the need for caution without excessive fear.
  • Participants share personal anecdotes of past chemical exposures, indicating that such incidents are common and often do not lead to serious health issues.
  • There is a suggestion that John should focus on safety practices and not dwell excessively on the incident, with some humor about the risks of everyday life compared to lab accidents.
  • Some participants recommend consulting Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for proper safety protocols before working with chemicals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the severity of the risk posed by the exposure. While some downplay the danger and suggest that John should not worry excessively, others acknowledge the potential risks associated with chemical exposure and emphasize the importance of safety precautions.

Contextual Notes

There are varying opinions on the effectiveness of nitrile gloves against DCM and the classification of methyl iodide as a carcinogen. The discussion reflects a range of personal experiences and safety practices, highlighting the complexity of assessing chemical exposure risks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for chemistry students, laboratory personnel, and individuals concerned about chemical safety and exposure risks in academic or professional settings.

Stadtjunky
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to read this! I'm student chemist (only 21), and last week I got exposed to a lot of methyl iodide when I spilt some dissolved in DCM onto my hand, although I was wearing nitrile gloves I think the chemical passed straight through, I had some skin irritation the next day. Now, after reading up so much about MeI, I'm paranoid that I'll get cancer. Am I being reasonable in worrying about getting cancer because of this exposure?

I seen a doctor, he says it's extremely unlikely, but isn't it also extremely unlikely that someone would have this sort of accident?

Many, many thanks,

John
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You shouldn't be using nitrile with DCM. Nitrile is not an effective barrier for it.

Lucky for you that MeI might not be that bad an actor. It is only classified A2 (suspected human carcinogen) by ACGIH and is not classified a human carcinogen by IARC. Still, it doesn't hurt to be more careful.

Your lab needs to get a handle on PPO if you intend to work with DCM. Use http://www.labsafety.com/Ansell-PVA-Gloves_24530219/" for DCM.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stadtjunky said:
Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to read this! I'm student chemist (only 21), and last week I got exposed to a lot of methyl iodide when I spilt some dissolved in DCM onto my hand, although I was wearing nitrile gloves I think the chemical passed straight through, I had some skin irritation the next day. Now, after reading up so much about MeI, I'm paranoid that I'll get cancer. Am I being reasonable in worrying about getting cancer because of this exposure?

I seen a doctor, he says it's extremely unlikely, but isn't it also extremely unlikely that someone would have this sort of accident?

Many, many thanks,

John

Methyl iodide is a common reagent. Any kind of halide causes irritation/inflamation. Now if were hydrofluoric acid that touched you I would be drinking milk like there's no tommorow.
 
gabriels-horn said:
Methyl iodide is a common reagent. Any kind of halide causes irritation/inflamation. Now if were hydrofluoric acid that touched you I would be drinking milk like there's no tommorow.

Have you ever been exposed to this, or know anyone that has and hasn't got cancer? I mean, like, dermal exposure?

Should the nitrile gloves stop DCM getting through for like 10 seconds perhaps?
 
Stadtjunky said:
Have you ever been exposed to this, or know anyone that has and hasn't got cancer? I mean, like, dermal exposure?

Should the nitrile gloves stop DCM getting through for like 10 seconds perhaps?

How much are we talking about here exactly? A 1 L bottle, 100 mL?
 
gabriels-horn said:
How much are we talking about here exactly? A 1 L bottle, 100 mL?

I would estimate about 10-15 mls of this mixture fell onto my gloves (which stayed on my hands for like 5-6 seconds). The mixture had about 10% pure MeI, the rest was DCM.
 
Stadtjunky said:
I would estimate about 10-15 mls of this mixture fell onto my gloves (which stayed on my hands for like 5-6 seconds). The mixture had about 10% pure MeI, the rest was DCM.

Relax then. Don't get too worried about 1 mL of methyl iodide. You're bound to have slip ups every once and a while. Just be cautious when using hazardous stuff, read the MSDS before you work with something (useful info in there) and avoid hydrofluoric acid.
 
Last edited:
gabriels-horn said:
Relax then.

It obviously got through my skin if my skin was red and irritated :(

But you think the risk is small?
 
Your chances of getting hit by some car today when you will be going home are probably still higher then dying of cancer because of that spill.

Relax and concentrate, don't let that car kill you just because you are preoccupied with fear - you will increase number of methyl iodide victims.
 
  • #10
Borek said:
Your chances of getting hit by some car today when you will be going home are probably still higher then dying of cancer because of that spill.

Relax and concentrate, don't let that car kill you just because you are preoccupied with fear - you will increase number of methyl iodide victims.


But are you aware of the toxicity of this deadly compound? :(
 
  • #11
As you were told - it is not as deadly as you seem to be thinking. You already did what you should - you have visited your doctor. Good decision. Now there are three other things to do. First one - accept what you have been told by everyone - you are on the safe side. Second one - make resolution to be less clumsy in the lab (not that it will work, how many times did I tell that to myself...). Third one - open a beer and watch some movie that puts you in a good mood. Stop worrying, it makes you look ugly and live shorter.
 
  • #12
Borek said:
As you were told - it is not as deadly as you seem to be thinking. You already did what you should - you have visited your doctor. Good decision. Now there are three other things to do. First one - accept what you have been told by everyone - you are on the safe side. Second one - make resolution to be less clumsy in the lab (not that it will work, how many times did I tell that to myself...). Third one - open a beer and watch some movie that puts you in a good mood. Stop worrying, it makes you look ugly and live shorter.

Thanks Borek, I really appreciate your response. As a chemist surely it's not un-normal to have a few sleepless nights worrying about the toxicity of various chemicals, espicially if you're young and inexperienced?
 
  • #13
Dangers that most of the chemists deal with are overrated. Sure, there are substances that should be treated with extreme caution, but accidental & temporary exposition to small amounts of most of the chemicals used in labs is not dangerous. It doesn't mean we shouldn't pay attention or ignore risks, but loosing a sleep is overreacting.

I don't blame you. We live in a world where fear mongering and media hype make most people chemophobic.
 
  • #14
It should be standard practice to consult an MSDS to educate yourself of the hazards *before* you work with a chemical. A good MSDS will mention what PPE you need.

Since MSDSs go by different names in different countries, here's the wiki -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_safety_data_sheet
 
  • #15
Borek said:
Dangers that most of the chemists deal with are overrated. Sure, there are substances that should be treated with extreme caution, but accidental & temporary exposition to small amounts of most of the chemicals used in labs is not dangerous. It doesn't mean we shouldn't pay attention or ignore risks, but loosing a sleep is overreacting.

I don't blame you. We live in a world where fear mongering and media hype make most people chemophobic.

I guess so. Have you had any chemical exposures in the past that worried you?
 
  • #16
lisab said:
It should be standard practice to consult an MSDS to educate yourself of the hazards *before* you work with a chemical. A good MSDS will mention what PPE you need.

Since MSDSs go by different names in different countries, here's the wiki -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_safety_data_sheet

Of course I always do this. But it was spilled on my hand through no fault of my own.
 
  • #17
Stadtjunky said:
I guess so. Have you had any chemical exposures in the past that worried you?

Worried? No. Exposure? On many occasions. Acids, bases, solvents, reagents. Including story described here. Part of the mixture reaction landed on my face. It tasted like Lugol's solution.

Now, it was almost 30 years ago and I have no doubts our labs were much less safe than they are today. We were in lab coats and at some more dangerous moments in glasses, but we were pipetting everything by mouth and gloves were unheard off. Still, during about ten years I have spent at the University the most serious accident I remember was when a friend of mine burnt (burnt? scalded? not sure about the correct word) himself with a phosphoric acid. That left nasty scar on his arm. I have not heard about anyone of my fellow students getting ill and dying because of the exposure to chemicals, so obviously even at this relatively low level safety regime chemistry wasn't that dangerous.
 
  • #18
Borek said:
Worried? No. Exposure? On many occasions. Acids, bases, solvents, reagents. Including story described here. Part of the mixture reaction landed on my face. It tasted like Lugol's solution.

Now, it was almost 30 years ago and I have no doubts our labs were much less safe than they are today. We were in lab coats and at some more dangerous moments in glasses, but we were pipetting everything by mouth and gloves were unheard off. Still, during about ten years I have spent at the University the most serious accident I remember was when a friend of mine burnt (burnt? scalded? not sure about the correct word) himself with a phosphoric acid. That left nasty scar on his arm. I have not heard about anyone of my fellow students getting ill and dying because of the exposure to chemicals, so obviously even at this relatively low level safety regime chemistry wasn't that dangerous.

Ouch. So I take it you use gloves and googles today? Did you have fumehoods back then? :S

Speaking on gloves, do you use nitrile gloves?
 
  • #19
We had fume hoods and reaction was done in one. I though I have the dangerous part behind, so I opened the hood. I was wrong.

I no longer work as a chemist. Only gloves I use are to keep my hands warm in winter. Without gloves I could serve a large lab - I have ten cold fingers.
 
  • #20
Borek said:
...Without gloves I could serve a large lab - I have ten cold fingers.

:rimshot: :smile:

Don't use nitrile with DCM. It just doesn't work.
 
  • #21
chemisttree said:
:rimshot: :smile:

Don't use nitrile with DCM. It just doesn't work.

Those .11 mm nitrile gloves, they should have a breakthrough time greater than 10 seconds for DCM, right?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
Ok then. You posted that it went through your gloves and resulted in a mild irritation?

nuff said.
 
  • #25
Any long term effects cannot be accurately predicted or mitigated. In the short term you are well, and have learned an important lesson.
 
  • #26
gabriels-horn said:
Relax then. Don't get too worried about 1 mL of methyl iodide. You're bound to have slip ups every once and a while. Just be cautious when using hazardous stuff, read the MSDS before you work with something (useful info in there) and avoid hydrofluoric acid.

Useful information in MSDS? They're probably the most useless thing in any lab.
 
  • #27
minerva said:
Useful information in MSDS? They're probably the most useless thing in any lab.

That's a pretty cavalier attitude on safety. What's so useless about them?

I would consider it pretty useful to know the relative toxicity of a substance I'm about to handle, and whether it can be absorbed through the skin, etc.
 
  • #28
alxm said:
That's a pretty cavalier attitude on safety. What's so useless about them?

I would consider it pretty useful to know the relative toxicity of a substance I'm about to handle, and whether it can be absorbed through the skin, etc.

...And nitrile... heh
 
  • #29
minerva said:
Useful information in MSDS? They're probably the most useless thing in any lab.

You're statement is almost too idiotic to warrant a response; almost. However, here is just one example from the MSDS of THF, "Distillation or evaporation can concentrate peroxides (if present) to create an explosion hazard." Pretty useless information I would say. Makes you think twice while you have that round-bottom flask on the rotovapor.

It's better to overcome your ignorance and live another day.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
gabriels-horn said:
You're statement is almost too idiotic to warrant a response; almost. However, here is just one example from the MSDS of THF, "Distillation or evaporation can concentrate peroxides (if present) to create an explosion hazard." Pretty useless information I would say. Makes you think twice while you have that round-bottom flask on the rotovapor.

It's better to overcome your ignorance and live another day.

Well said, and it's cheaper and less painful than a debridement and a dozen skin grafts!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K