For what values of paramater form a spanning set for P3

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the values of the parameter α for which the polynomials P_1(x), P_2(x), and P_3(x) form a spanning set for the vector space P_3. The context includes linear independence and the conditions under which these polynomials can span the space.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a spanning set of P_3 must contain at least three linearly independent vectors and proposes a method involving a matrix representation of the polynomials.
  • Another participant advises removing unnecessary columns from the matrix and emphasizes the importance of showing that the row rank of the remaining matrix is 3.
  • A later reply indicates that after reducing the matrix, the resulting form suggests that the polynomials may form a basis for P_3 for any value of α.
  • Some participants raise concerns about potential illegal operations during row reduction, such as dividing by α when it equals zero, which could affect the validity of the results.
  • There is mention of specific values of α that could lead to exceptions in the basis conditions, such as α = -1, which would require careful consideration.
  • One participant questions the necessity of division in the row reduction process and prompts a discussion about the reasoning behind row reducing the matrix to determine linear independence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the conditions under which the polynomials span P_3, with some suggesting that any value of α might work while others caution about specific cases that could invalidate this. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact values of α that ensure a spanning set.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that certain operations, such as dividing by specific values of α, could lead to exceptions in determining linear independence and spanning conditions. The discussion does not resolve these limitations or assumptions.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I have this question, and I'm not really sure how to go about it. Any help would be appreciated:

* Here is the question that is asked. (It is supposed to be a general question, and the question will change for the test. Thus, there may be 4 poly's to work with, or 2... etc.) *

<br /> P_1(x)=x^2+\alpha<br />
<br /> P_2(x)=x-\alpha<br />
<br /> P_3(x)=x^2+x+1<br />
For what values of parameter \alpha form a spanning set for P_3.


* This is what I have so far. I'm not sure if I'm going about it right. So this is where I need help :) *
Ok, so I know that a spanning set of P_3 must contain at least 3 vectors that are linearly independent.
IF the system is true:
<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> P_1(x) &amp; 0 \\<br /> P_2(x) &amp; 0 \\<br /> P_3(x) &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right)<br />
THEN the vectors are linearly dependent.

So if we setup the system:
<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \alpha &amp; -\alpha &amp; 1 &amp; 0 <br /> \end{array} \right)<br />

wherever \alpha causes the system to not equal 0 would be when the poly's span P3 right?

if this is right, then how do I show this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Forget the last column of 0s there is no need for it. You just need to show the row rank of the remaining 3x3 matrix is 3, so do it... (reduced elechon form, will be in your notes)
 
For this example:

ok after reducing the matrix I get:
<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 <br /> \end{array} \right)<br />

Therefore, does this mean that for any value of \alpha the poly's form a basis for P_3 ?
 
It may do - i can't say i bothered to do the question. To verify it, did you at any point do some thing that you aren't allowed to do? like divide by alpha, which isn't valid if alpha is zero...
 
Well, if \alpha is zero, then it's trivially a basis anyways for this example.

I don't know what else he could have done that would be illegal, unless it were something really silly. Then again I haven't done the question either!

Edit: I was bored and checked it. Indeed your row reduction is correct.
 
he could have divided by a-1 (use a for alpha), or a+1, or any number of similar things depending on the question, which is the way to get exceptions in these kinds of questions, for example suppose in the row reduced form the final row is 0, 0, a+1 reading left to right, then it will be a basis if and only if a=/=-1.
 
yeah, good point. I'm tired
 
As it turns out, though, no division is necessary. But, more importantly, does the original poster know why he should be row reducing this matrix?
 
Last edited:
By placing P1(x), P2(x), and P3(x) in a matrix representation, then the rank of this matrix must equal 3 to span P3. So row reducing the matrix, ensuring that it is consistent, and then setting the system to 0 and solving for the unknowns allows one to deduce where the vectors are dependent/independent and then it can be shown where/if/ and when it spans P3.

I hope that's right :)

*by the way. thanks for the help. it's truly appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K