Chemically resistant sealing options

  • Thread starter Thread starter EagerBeaver1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Options Sealing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

FFKM (perfluoroelastomer) sealing solutions are highly regarded for their chemical resistance in the chemical processing industry, but they are not universally the best choice for all applications. The specific chemicals, temperatures, and pressures involved dictate the suitability of materials. Alternatives like TRPlast and Viton also offer significant resistance, with TRPlast showing comparable properties to PTFE. Compatibility with specific chemicals and mechanical stress durability should be considered when selecting sealing materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical resistance properties of elastomers
  • Knowledge of FFKM and its applications in sealing solutions
  • Familiarity with temperature and pressure specifications in chemical processing
  • Ability to interpret seal compatibility charts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific formulations of FFKM and their chemical compatibility
  • Explore the properties and applications of TRPlast in chemical processing
  • Learn about Viton and its performance in high-temperature environments
  • Review seal compatibility charts for various chemicals and elastomers
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, materials scientists, and professionals in the chemical processing industry seeking to optimize sealing solutions for high-performance applications.

EagerBeaver1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have any experience with FFKM sealing solutions? I am looking for rubber seals to be used in the chemical processing industry and would need material that has high chemical resistant properties.

I've done some research online and found something called TRPlast which has a similar chemical resistance to PTFE so this could work, but before I rushed into making commitments, I thought it couldn't hurt to seek out a second opinion.

Is FFKM the best option for chemical processing or should I continue to shop around?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EagerBeaver1 said:
Is FFKM the best option for chemical processing or should I continue to shop around?

There is not a best option for *all* chemicals and *all* temperatures/pressures. Which chemicals are you trying to resist, and at what temperature/pressure?

Specifying Chemical resistance or chemical processing is vague. Liquid chlorine, sulphur gas, sulfuric acid, plasticizers, and ethylene oxide are all chemicals, but their elastomer specs can vary, especially when cost/temperature are concerned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and berkeman
What Chemair said.
Additionally: Once you decide on a material (FFKM, for example), you have the added concern of the specific formulation. FFKM with a carbon filler is absolutely unsuitable for some applications where FFKM with a 'mineral' filler performs beautifully. It's definitely an area where learning from the mistakes/successes of others is wise. Pioneering is expensive.
 
Use silly putty
 
I were looking for a rubber that withstand more than 100ºC and an oil (I could use the oil that is compatible with the rubber) and made a big chart but found no one better than viton and PTFE (I need compatibility also with vacuum) so I will use a ceramic :(

Here are seal compatibility charts that could help:
https://www.finemech.com/tech_resources/chemical_resistance.pdf
http://www.saltech.co.il/_uploads/dbsattachedfiles/chemical.pdf
 
EagerBeaver1 said:
Does anyone have any experience with FFKM sealing solutions? I am looking for rubber seals to be used in the chemical processing industry and would need material that has high chemical resistant properties.

I've done some research online and found something called TRPlast which has a similar chemical resistance to PTFE so this could work, but before I rushed into making commitments, I thought it couldn't hurt to seek out a second opinion.

Is FFKM the best option for chemical processing or should I continue to shop around?

Thanks
These materials above are belonging to family of fluoropolymer elastomers. It is on the high end of performance, although in your case temperature performance is possibly redundant while durability against mechanical stress may be problematic. For lower operating temperatures (below 150C typically) silicone (PDMS) based sealing parts are cheaper and more durable. Silicones have chemical resistance similar to fluoropolymers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K