Chemistry: Electromagnetic Wavelengths and Frequency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between electromagnetic wavelengths, frequency, and energy, particularly in the context of blackbody radiation and the implications of temperature on emitted radiation. Participants explore how these concepts relate to statements found in chemistry literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and energy, questioning whether the statements from chemistry papers are contradictory.
  • It is noted that frequency and wavelength are related by the equation λf = c, indicating that knowing one allows for the determination of the other.
  • Participants discuss the energy of a photon being expressed in terms of frequency (E=hf) and wavelength (E=hc/λ), suggesting that energy is proportional to frequency and inversely proportional to wavelength.
  • One participant mentions that the amount of blackbody radiation emitted at a given wavelength depends on the object's temperature, with higher temperatures resulting in more light emitted at shorter wavelengths.
  • There is a challenge to the interpretation that the statements from the chemistry papers are incorrect, with a participant questioning why the relationship between frequency and energy would invalidate the original statements about emitted radiation.
  • A later reply indicates that a participant realizes their interpretation of the statements was incorrect, suggesting a shift in understanding rather than a resolution of the initial confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the statements from the chemistry papers are contradictory. There is ongoing confusion and differing interpretations regarding the relationships between wavelength, frequency, and energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of the equations and the statements from the chemistry papers, indicating that assumptions about the relationships may not be fully resolved.

DarylMBCP
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I was reading through some Chemistry papers when I came across these two lines; When solids are heated, they emit electromagnetic radiation over a wide range of wavelengths. The amount of radiation energy emitted by an object at a certain temperature depends on its wavelength. However, I remember reading elsewhere that the radiant energy of an electromagnetic wave increases as its frequency increases. If this is true, then the two statements are my understanding is contradictory with the two lines. Am I misinterpretting the two lines from the Chemistry papers or is there something else I am not realising? Any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The frequency f and wavelength \lambda of light are related by \lambda f = c where c is the speed of light.
 
Thanks for the help, but how can I relate that to the question? What I mean is that the two earlier equations are contradictory since one says that the energy of wave depends in its frequency while the other says that the amount of energy of the wave depends on its wavelength. Which of these is true or is my interpretation wrong? Thanks for the help anyway.
 
Wavelength and frequency are not independent parameters. Knowing one is equivalent to knowing the other, so you can express the energy in terms of either. For example, the energy of a photon can be written

E=hf=\frac{hc}{\lambda}

where h is Planck's constant and c is the speed of light.
 
From the equation, do you mean that frequency is proportional to the energy of a type of light (like infrared of ultraviolet) while wavelength is inversely proportional so the statements that 'When solids are heated, they emit electromagnetic radiation over a wide range of wavelengths. The amount of radiation energy emitted by an object at a certain temperature depends on its wavelength' are wrong? Thanks for the help by the way.
 
The amount of blackbody radiation at a given wavelength depends on the object's temperature.

See Law[/url]

Objects at higher temperatures emit more light at a shorter wavelength (higher frequency).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DarylMBCP said:
From the equation, do you mean that frequency is proportional to the energy of a type of light (like infrared of ultraviolet) while wavelength is inversely proportional so the statements that 'When solids are heated, they emit electromagnetic radiation over a wide range of wavelengths. The amount of radiation energy emitted by an object at a certain temperature depends on its wavelength' are wrong? Thanks for the help by the way.
No. Why would what I said imply that that statement is wrong?
 
Oh I get what you guys mean. I was interpretting the statements wrongly. K, thanks for the help. It's really appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K