Chern Simons form: calculation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SergejVictorov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Form
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
SergejVictorov
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey folks, I'm trying to understand a couple of calculations in Chern-Simons theory and I'm stuck.

I want to prove the following in four spacetime dimensions:

Let [tex]G[/tex] be a Lie Group with generators [tex]T_{a}[/tex]. Further let
[tex]A=T_{a} A^{a}_{\mu} dx^{\mu}[/tex]
be a connection and
[tex]F=dA+A \wedge A[/tex]
its field strength. Now I want to prove
[tex]Tr F \wedge F= d Tr(A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)[/tex]

First I tried the following
[tex]F\wedge F=dA\wedge dA+dA \wedge A\wedge A+A\wedge A\wedge dA+A\wedge A\wedge A\wedge A[/tex]

[tex]d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA[/tex]

When I take the trace, I can make a [tex]A\wedge A\wedge dA[/tex] into [tex]dA \wedge A\wedge A[/tex], but that leaves the questions of why the trace of [tex]A^4[/tex] has to vanish and where the factors of 2/3 come from.

Alternatively, I tried the following:

Let [tex]A_t=tA[/tex] and
[tex]F_t=dA_t+A_t\wedge A_t=dt\wedgeA+t dA+t^2 A\wedge A[/tex]

Now one can evaluate [tex]Tr F_t \wedge F_t[/tex] and afterwards set t=1. This works out fine, but I still don't understand why the trace of [tex]A^4[/tex] has to vanish.

So for the moment, it all boils down to: why is [tex]Tr A^4=0[/tex]?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SergejVictorov said:
[tex]d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA[/tex]

The sign of the third term on the right hand side should be minus, due to antisymmetry of the exterior derivative. We also have
[tex]Tr\left[dA\wedge A\wedge A \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k}A_{l} \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{l}(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k} \right] = -\epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{i}(\partial_{j}A_{k})A_{l} \right]=-Tr\left[A\wedge dA\wedge A \right][/tex],
in which the cyclic property of trace and the antisymmetry of the [tex]\displaystyle{\epsilon}[/tex] tensor is used.

[tex]Tr\left[A^{4}\right]=0[/tex] can be proved similarly.