Chern Simons form: calculation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SergejVictorov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Form
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculations within Chern-Simons theory, specifically proving the identity Tr F ∧ F = d Tr(A ∧ dA + (2/3)A ∧ A ∧ A) in four-dimensional spacetime. The participants explore the implications of the trace of A^4 vanishing and the role of the exterior derivative's antisymmetry in the calculations. Key techniques include evaluating Tr F_t ∧ F_t and utilizing the cyclic property of the trace alongside the antisymmetry of the ε tensor. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these mathematical properties for successful proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Chern-Simons theory
  • Familiarity with Lie Groups and their generators
  • Knowledge of differential forms and exterior derivatives
  • Proficiency in trace operations within linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie Groups and their representations
  • Learn about differential geometry and its applications in theoretical physics
  • Investigate the role of the ε tensor in tensor calculus
  • Explore advanced topics in gauge theory and topological field theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in geometry and topology, and graduate students studying advanced topics in gauge theory and Chern-Simons theory.

SergejVictorov
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey folks, I'm trying to understand a couple of calculations in Chern-Simons theory and I'm stuck.

I want to prove the following in four spacetime dimensions:

Let [tex]G[/tex] be a Lie Group with generators [tex]T_{a}[/tex]. Further let
[tex]A=T_{a} A^{a}_{\mu} dx^{\mu}[/tex]
be a connection and
[tex]F=dA+A \wedge A[/tex]
its field strength. Now I want to prove
[tex]Tr F \wedge F= d Tr(A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)[/tex]

First I tried the following
[tex]F\wedge F=dA\wedge dA+dA \wedge A\wedge A+A\wedge A\wedge dA+A\wedge A\wedge A\wedge A[/tex]

[tex]d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA[/tex]

When I take the trace, I can make a [tex]A\wedge A\wedge dA[/tex] into [tex]dA \wedge A\wedge A[/tex], but that leaves the questions of why the trace of [tex]A^4[/tex] has to vanish and where the factors of 2/3 come from.

Alternatively, I tried the following:

Let [tex]A_t=tA[/tex] and
[tex]F_t=dA_t+A_t\wedge A_t=dt\wedgeA+t dA+t^2 A\wedge A[/tex]

Now one can evaluate [tex]Tr F_t \wedge F_t[/tex] and afterwards set t=1. This works out fine, but I still don't understand why the trace of [tex]A^4[/tex] has to vanish.

So for the moment, it all boils down to: why is [tex]Tr A^4=0[/tex]?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SergejVictorov said:
[tex]d (A \wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)= dA\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}dA\wedge A\wedge A +\frac{2}{3} A\wedge dA\wedge A+\frac{2}{3} A\wedge A \wedge dA[/tex]

The sign of the third term on the right hand side should be minus, due to antisymmetry of the exterior derivative. We also have
[tex]Tr\left[dA\wedge A\wedge A \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k}A_{l} \right]= \epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{l}(\partial_{i}A_{j})A_{k} \right] = -\epsilon^{ijkl}Tr\left[A_{i}(\partial_{j}A_{k})A_{l} \right]=-Tr\left[A\wedge dA\wedge A \right][/tex],
in which the cyclic property of trace and the antisymmetry of the [tex]\displaystyle{\epsilon}[/tex] tensor is used.

[tex]Tr\left[A^{4}\right]=0[/tex] can be proved similarly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
953
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K