News China destroys satellite with missile

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around China's recent successful antisatellite weapon test, which has raised concerns about the potential for an arms race in space. Experts warn that this marks a significant escalation in the weaponization of space, ending a long period of restraint. The U.S. administration has resisted calls for a global treaty banning such tests, emphasizing the need for freedom of action in space. Participants express skepticism about the U.S.'s capabilities to counter China's advancements, noting that while the U.S. has had antisatellite technology for decades, China's recent demonstration highlights vulnerabilities in U.S. satellite systems. The conversation also touches on the implications of China's growing technological prowess, particularly in GPS technology, and the potential economic impacts on U.S. industries. Concerns are raised about China's ability to leverage its technological advancements for military purposes, as well as the broader implications for global trade and competition. The discussion concludes with reflections on the risks of space debris resulting from antisatellite tests and the future of military operations in space.
  • #31
An update on the aftereffects of China's ASAT test from CelestTrak.

1,337 pieces have been cataloged as of Apr 5. 44 of those pieces will re-enter the atmosphere within 10 years. Most will orbit for centuries. Since the test, there's routinely been more than 2500 close approaches (within 5 km) of space debris per week.

This stands to become one of the dumbest stunts staged in space history (Westford Needles back in the 60's was pretty dumb, as well - I can't think of any others that are comparable).

CelestTrak has some interesting data and some interesting scenarios. You have to download AGI's viewer software to watch the scenarios, but the viewer software is free.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
hopefully if there is ever a war in space where opposing sides try to destroy all the other side's satellite, we don't end up with such a thick debris field around Earth that it becomes too difficult to put satellites in orbit again. i bet a trash collection project for orbital debris would be extremely expensive.
 
  • #33
Then again the US has a huge military advantage over China in terms of utilising space and the modern military parlance lays great emphasis on 3 dimendional warfare so perhaps the Chinese intention was to show the US it can severely limit 1 dimension by effectively mining space using the US's own satellites as mine material.

So although a severe nuisance in terms of making the peaceful exploration of space more difficult militarily it may not be so stupid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K