China launches quantum-enabled satellite Micius

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arabianights
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China Satellite
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the launch of China's quantum-enabled satellite Micius, exploring the implications of quantum entanglement for communication technology. Participants delve into the nature of entangled photons, their potential for data transmission, and the underlying physics involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the satellite's function of creating pairs of entangled photons and transmitting one half to ground stations.
  • There is a question about the feasibility of using entangled photons for data transmission, with references to existing literature suggesting limitations.
  • One participant asserts that entangled photons cannot be used to send data but can facilitate secure key distribution for encryption purposes.
  • A participant inquires about the consequences of breaking entanglement and questions how entangled particles can exhibit states without violating conservation laws.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ability of entangled photons to transmit data, with some asserting it is not possible while others explore the implications of entanglement and its applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of data transmission and the effects of breaking entanglement.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and prior discussions, indicating a complexity in understanding entanglement and its implications for communication technology. There are unresolved questions about the mechanics of entanglement and its relationship to conservation laws.

arabianights
Messages
68
Reaction score
8
China has successfully launched the world's first quantum-enabled satellite, state media said.

It was carried on a rocket which blasted off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in China's north west early on Tuesday.

The satellite is named after the ancient Chinese scientist and philosopher Micius.

The project tests a technology that could one day offer digital communication that is "hack-proof".

But even if it succeeds, it is a long way off that goal, and there is some mind-bending physics to get past first.

full story:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-37091833
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arabianights said:
China has successfully launched the world's first quantum-enabled satellite, state media said.

What's a "quantum-enabled satellite"?
 
Drakkith said:
What's a "quantum-enabled satellite"?

The satellite will create pairs of so-called entangled photons - tiny sub-atomic particles of light whose properties are dependent on each other - beaming one half of each pair down to base stations in China and Austria.

Open it if you can, it's a good article :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
And behind this is Anton Zeilinger and his former PhD-student Pan Jianwei, so this thing obviously has some scientific merit.
 
So, could entangled photons actually send data? I have read all of these journal stories that say that you can't force a specific state unless you break the entanglement. How does this work?
 
idea2000 said:
So, could entangled photons actually send data? I have read all of these journal stories that say that you can't force a specific state unless you break the entanglement. How does this work?
No, entangled photons cannot be used to send data. We have many older threads explaining why.

They can be used as a very secure way of distributing encryption keys so that people can use traditional channels to send encrypted data without some malfunction cious thid party being able to read or tamper with the transmitted data.
 
Thx for your reply =) I was wondering what happens when you break the entanglement? This is a quote from a webpage I just read:

"But by forcing that distant particle to be +1 or -1, that means, no matter the outcome, your particle here on Earth has a 50/50 shot of being +1 or -1, with no bearing on the particle so many light years distant."

How come the two entangled particles don't need to choose opposite states? Does this violate conservation laws?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
16K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K