Choice of Medical Physics MS Programs

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between two Master of Science programs in Medical Physics: Wayne State University and the University at Buffalo. Participants share insights on program accreditation, curriculum focus, faculty engagement, practical experience opportunities, and financial considerations, reflecting on their personal experiences and perspectives regarding these programs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants emphasize the importance of CAMPEP accreditation for medical physics programs, noting that both Wayne State and Buffalo are accredited.
  • There is a viewpoint that programs should focus strongly on physics rather than just meeting the minimum requirements for board exams.
  • Participants suggest that prospective students should consider the availability of interesting research projects and the opportunity to engage with potential supervisors.
  • The need for faculty with protected teaching time is highlighted, as medical physicists often have demanding clinical responsibilities.
  • Alumni success in securing residency placements is mentioned as a factor to consider when evaluating programs.
  • Hands-on practical experience is deemed crucial, with inquiries about opportunities for part-time work and the integration of students into clinical settings.
  • Financial support is discussed, with caution advised regarding the potential lack of guaranteed stipends in some programs.
  • One participant expresses a preference for the Buffalo program based on discussions with the program director, indicating a focus on fundamental physics and practical experience.
  • A later reply mentions the admission of students under CAMPEP accreditation, suggesting ongoing discussions about program quality.
  • Another participant shares their background in MEMS engineering and materials science, detailing their application process to multiple programs and their desire to enter the medical physics field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of accreditation and practical experience in medical physics programs, but there are varying opinions on the emphasis of physics in the curriculum and the significance of faculty engagement. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which program may be preferable, as personal preferences and experiences differ.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include the lack of firsthand student experiences shared for both programs and the varying definitions of what constitutes a strong emphasis on physics in the curriculum. Additionally, the financial support situation may vary significantly between programs.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective students considering MS programs in Medical Physics, individuals interested in the accreditation and curriculum structure of such programs, and those exploring career transitions into medical physics may find this discussion relevant.

basisfunction
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good morning,

I have a choice to make between MS programs in Medical Physics this Fall: Wayne State vs the University at Buffalo. Are there some graduates from these programs out there who might offer some perspective on one over the other? Buffalo ranks higher for science in general, but Wayne State appears to have the longer history/experience in this specific field and in training of clinical medical physicists (and then again Roswell Park is the oldest cancer treatment facility in the US). How bad is the Detroit metro region, really?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not personally familiar with either program, but I can tell you a few things that I would look for in a medical physics program.

1. CAMPEP accreditation. I think both of those programs are accredited - so check.

2. Some people disagree with me on this, but I feel that the program should have a stong emphasis on physics - not just completing barely enough coursework for you to pass your board exams.

3. Research projects that you personally find interesting. Talk with potential supervisors. Look at projects current and past students have done.

4. Faculty with protected teaching time. Medical physicists tend to be extremely busy with clinical responsibilities. I can count on my hand the number of days in the last year that I've left work at the end of the clinical day.

5. Alumni that have gone on to places you would like to go. Are most of the students geting residency placements? Where?

6. Hands-on practical experience. Are there opportunities for part-time QA work? (This also applies to point 7.) Are you limited to lab experience? How integrated are students into the clinical setting? More practical experience is better. Also, what equpment will you be exposed to and how modern is it?

7. Financial support. Not all medical physics programs come with complete or guaranteed stipends. So you may end up having to foot some of the bill yourself. Think seriously about the support each program offers and don't count on immediately finding a winfall of a permanent medical physics position on graduation that will allow you to pay off debt.
 
I'm not personally familiar with either program, but I can tell you a few things that I would look for in a medical physics program.

1. CAMPEP accreditation. I think both of those programs are accredited - so check.

2. Some people disagree with me on this, but I feel that the program should have a stong emphasis on physics - not just completing barely enough coursework for you to pass your board exams.

3. Research projects that you personally find interesting. Talk with potential supervisors. Look at projects current and past students have done.

4. Faculty with protected teaching time. Medical physicists tend to be extremely busy with clinical responsibilities. I can count on my hand the number of days in the last year that I've left work at the end of the clinical day.

5. Alumni that have gone on to places you would like to go. Are most of the students geting residency placements? Where?

6. Hands-on practical experience. Are there opportunities for part-time QA work? (This also applies to point 7.) Are you limited to lab experience? How integrated are students into the clinical setting? More practical experience is better. Also, what equpment will you be exposed to and how modern is it?

7. Financial support. Not all medical physics programs come with complete or guaranteed stipends. So you may end up having to foot some of the bill yourself. Think seriously about the support each program offers and don't count on immediately finding a winfall of a permanent medical physics position on graduation that will allow you to pay off debt.
Thanks Choppy.

Yes, Buffalo and Wayne State are accredited. I have settled on Buffalo mostly, but wanted to see if anyone on the forums had anything to say. I am comfortable with the prospects of practical experience in the Buffalo program. I have been in communication with the Director and our discussions seem to reveal a good overall program: fundamental physics of imaging and therapy with practical experience every semester. I haven't spoken with students yet, I'll make a better effort. I also don't know about protected teaching time, which I will follow up on. Thanks again.
 
Choppy's comments are spot-on. FWIW, we are admitting our first students under CAMPEP accreditation this fall, and these issues are *exactly* what we have been discussing.
 
That would be Cleveland State, then. I had fixed my list back in September or so; I don't think that one was on the CAMPEP list as of yet.

By way of a little more background, I am a MEMS engineer and materials science researcher who has been considering the medical physics profession for some time. I got to know the Med Phys staff at my local regional hospital pretty well and had some good experiences (I started shadowing them in 2008 and still go in on occasion). I have ten years of experience in my present endeavors and am now moving on to the next step.

I refreshed my GRE last year and went for it. I was fairly concerned about the 2012/2014 initiatives so I applied to 17 programs, all MS. I pre-screened Columbia, UCLA, Wisconsin, and
Chicago before they could pre-screen me. I also clipped off the last four by chronological deadline because some acceptances already appeared before those deadlines. I just wanted to get into one accredited program, and get my one shot at passing ABR I next year. As it turns out I had a selection of schools, which I am thankful for.

Thanks for the feedback, I feel more comfortable with my decision.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K