Discussion Overview
The discussion focuses on considerations for selecting a flexible hose for outlet air pressure vessels operating at 11 bar in industrial settings. Participants explore various factors, including working pressure specifications and the meaning of "instrument air." The conversation touches on standards, safety regulations, and practical applications in different environments.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the considerations for choosing a hose with a maximum working pressure suitable for 11 bar applications, requesting sources for information.
- Another participant suggests looking for standard air hoses, noting that a typical rubber air hose can handle up to 300 PSI (20 bar) working pressure.
- There is a consensus that "inst air" likely refers to instrument air, which is compressed air that has been dried and is free of oil.
- A participant mentions that instrument air is commonly used in industrial applications to operate valves and control devices, providing context for its use.
- One participant shares their experience with instrument air pressure in their previous workplaces, indicating that typical operating pressures can vary significantly from the system design pressure.
- Another participant emphasizes the importance of adhering to local laws and safety regulations regarding maximum pressure limits, particularly in California, suggesting the use of pressure regulators in assembly line settings.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the definition of instrument air and its applications. However, there are varying opinions on the specific pressure limits and safety regulations that should be considered, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for hose selection.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference different standards and practices, but there is no consensus on specific pressure limits or the best hose specifications for the discussed applications. The conversation reflects a range of experiences and interpretations of safety regulations.