Choosing Integrating constants for Electric Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the electric field at a point along the axis of a nonconducting disk with a uniform positive surface charge density. The original poster is attempting to understand the limits of integration for the electric field calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions why the integration limits are set from 0 to R instead of -R to R, indicating confusion about the physical setup of the problem. Some participants clarify the terminology regarding integration limits and suggest that the integration should logically proceed from the center outwards.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the integration limits and the reasoning behind them. Some have offered insights into the terminology and the logical flow of the integration process, while others are still seeking clarity on the setup.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the correct interpretation of the integration limits in the context of the disk's geometry, with some participants emphasizing the importance of understanding the physical meaning behind the mathematical expressions used.

Jen2114
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A nonconducting disk of radius R has a uniform positive surface charge density sigma. Find the Electric field at a point along the axis of the disk at a distance x from its center. Assume that x is positive

Homework Equations


E=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I'm suppose to find dEX for one ring and then integrate to find the field due to all the rings.
dEx= (k) (2πσrx)dr /(x^2 +r^2) ^3/2
Why should you integrate this component from 0 to R and not R to -R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where exactly is the part of the disk from r=0 to r=-R? That is, where are the negative radius locations?

By the way, it is not an integrating constant as you suggest in the title. This is a definite integral so there is no integrating constant.
 
For any future reference,what you mean is called "interval of integration" and not constants.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DEvens
Hi,
sorry you're right I should've said that I don't understand why the limits of integration are 0 to R and not -R to R. The center of the disk is located at (0,0) and so the negative radius is at (0,-R) and the positive is at (0,R). The radius of the first ring I'm integrating is r and so then I have to integrate for the entire disk.
 
LittleMrsMonkey said:
For any future reference,what you mean is called "interval of integration" and not constants.
Thank you, I will be much more clear next time
 
Think about it logically.You are integrating radially outwards from 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114
So dEx=(1/4πε)*((2πσrx)/(x^2+r^2)^3/2)) is the electric field component in the x direction and so when you integrate to obtain the electric field for all the small rings in the disk , you are working your way out towards R, the radius of the entire disk. So that's why you integrate from 0 to R and not -R to R?
 
It's easy,see?
You've forgotten the dr in your formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114
Ahhh ok I see thanks. Yeah, super clear now. Thanks I'll add the dr. Thanks again!
 
  • #10
You're welcome.I'm studying for an E-M exam right now anyway,so it's good use of my time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K