Choosing Physics or Electrical Engineering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around choosing between physics and electrical engineering (EE) for a career focused on building advanced power systems. The individual expresses a strong interest in constructing electrical devices and understanding complex physics concepts, particularly in light storage and trapping. Concerns arise about whether a degree in EE would provide sufficient background in advanced physics necessary for innovative projects, while a physics degree might limit practical building opportunities. Participants suggest that both fields have significant overlap, emphasizing the importance of personal interest and the quality of the educational experience, including available electives and research opportunities. They also highlight historical examples of prominent figures who transitioned between the two disciplines, reinforcing that the choice of major may not be as critical as the knowledge and skills acquired.
J3J33J333
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm trying to decide between physics and electrical engineering. I like building electrical stuff, and I like solving physics problems, but my main goal is to try to build power systems that integrate things like what can be found in this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.0520. I would major in EE, but I'm afraid that I won't be able to get the background to use that type of advanced physics in what I build I don't want to EE if it will take so much time that I'll never have time to try to build stuff that uses advanced materials and BOE's. I don't want to do physics if I'll never get to build things other than probing experiments.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Can you say how that paper may relate to building power systems? Thanks.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Can you say how that paper may relate to building power systems? Thanks.
I want to try to work on storing light as light. That paper is just one of the things i was trying to understand. I know it's hard because the light travels quickly and rapidly loses energy to heat. I've been looking at papers related to light trapping, but it's hard to understand them without the quantum and statistical mechanics background. The thing is though that I want to try to build stuff, too, and I'm afraid the physics degree, which would help me understand these papers, would make it harder to move into building stuff.
 
Last edited:
You might consider studying Lasers. In many ways they sit on the boundary between those two subjects, particularly in industry.

However, I'm a little confused about the "choosing" part of your question. My advice is to study what interests you, there can be quite a bit of overlap in these subjects. I don't believe which you choose for your major will matter much as you move on, it's what you studied and know that counts more.
 
DaveE said:
I don't believe which you choose for your major will matter much as you move on, it's what you studied and know that counts more.
I absolutely agree. There is a very large overlap in the undergraduate requirements I would be more interested in what that choice will mean in the near term for you. What you will be required to study and what subjects will be available as electives? What is the quality of of the instruction? Are there opportunities for meaningful research and collaboration/internships. Talk to people (students and faculty) ...
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and gwnorth
You are not alone! Feynman tried out his muscles in electrical engineering for a while before he jumped into physics. Dirac studied electrical engineering but switched to physics. There must be more...
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top