Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Don't know if anyone can help me but have a bit of confusion with Srednicki ch75 p466 just above (75.55). I understand why in non-Abelian gauge theory we get extra factors [itex]Tr(T^aT^bT^c)[/itex] and so on, but I don't understand why the [itex] P_{L}\to1/2 [/itex] diagrams then end up with the extra factor [itex] 1/2Tr([T^a,T^b],T^c) [/itex], does anyone know?

Also then in ch77, Srednicki says the triangle diagrams analyzed now come with the extra factor [itex] Tr(T^a T^b) [/itex], why not [itex] Tr(T^a T^b T^c) [/itex]?, after all they are the same diagrams he talks about of p466 (except for some changes he notes on p470 that dont seem to make a difference to this argument)

Thanks, would be really grateful if anyone is familiar with this...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Chrial gauge theories and anomalies(Srednicki ch75-76)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Chrial gauge theories | Date |
---|---|

A Can disjoint states be relevant for the same quantum system? | Mar 13, 2018 |

I Question about gauge invariance and the A-B effect | Mar 3, 2018 |

I Do the SU(n) generators represent any observables? | Feb 14, 2018 |

I Gauge Symmetry | Jan 13, 2018 |

Insights Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Gauge Fixing - Comments | Dec 28, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**