Circles in Non-Euclidean Geometry

Click For Summary
Circles are not considered straight lines in Non-Euclidean Geometry, as the definition varies across different types. In spherical geometry, great circles act as geodesics, representing the shortest distance between two points. Conversely, in hyperbolic geometry, all lines extend infinitely and do not form circles. While there are mappings that represent straight lines as arcs of circles, these are not true circles within the geometry itself. The discussion highlights the complexities of defining geometric concepts across various Non-Euclidean frameworks.
ƒ(x)
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
Are circles considered straight lines in Non-Euclidean Geometry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is abit vague... *which* non-Euclidean geometry? And what do you mean by "straight line"? Do you mean geodesic? Certainly on a sphere we can define a geometry where every great circle is a geodesic, which is locally distance minimising between two points.
 
In elliptic geometry, "straight lines" (as yenchin said, geodesics) may be closed paths but, technically, there still exist "circles" that are quite different from those. In hyperbolic geometry, all "lines" are unbounded and so are definitely NOT "circles".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I started wondering about this because my uncle and myself started talking about Nikolai Lobachevsky. I don't know if that will help answer the question.
 
ƒ(x) said:
Well, I started wondering about this because my uncle and myself started talking about Nikolai Lobachevsky. I don't know if that will help answer the question.

Hi ƒ(x)! :smile:

In Lobachevsky space, all straight lines go off to infinity, so none of them are circles.

(Though there is a "map" of Lobachevsky space, in which all the straight lines are mapped as arcs of circles which meet the enclosing circle at right-angles … but they aren't circles "in" the space, only "in" the map. :wink:)
 
Lobachevsky space being the aforementioned "hyperbolic space". And I corrected the silly typo in my first response.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K