1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Circuit Analysis : Using Kirchoffs

  1. Aug 30, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/939/95788682.jpg [Broken]



    Find Vo
    Vo = -50V (given answer by my prof)

    2. Relevant equations
    KVL
    (Series) V=V1+V2
    (Parallel) V=V1=V2
    KCL
    Current toward the node = Current Away from the node
    V=IR

    3. The attempt at a solution

    i tried to solve for the i in the left ckt
    i=(6v+0.004Vo)/2k <-- 6v is in series with 0.004Vo (i think)

    by KCL at the right
    25i - (Vo/40k) - (Vo/10k) = 0 <--- 40k and 10k is in parallel so Voltage would be equal
    the substitute terms

    25((6v+0.004Vo)/2k) - (Vo/40k) - (Vo/10k) = 0
    Vo = 1kV <--- actually is not right XD



    so there it is,, what did i miss?

    Edit : (50v change to 6v)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 30, 2011 #2

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Where does the 6V come from in your equations? The diagram shows a 50V source.

    Also, the potential across the 2k resistor appears to be 50V - 0.004Vo. "Walk" around the loop in the direction of the current and it goes: 50V - i*2k - 0.004Vo = 0.
     
  4. Aug 30, 2011 #3

    Aw.. my mistake,, 50v at the left should be 6v Sorry :tongue:

    Edit: So there it is i changed the circuit.
     
  5. Aug 30, 2011 #4
    by referring to what you said sir,

    i= (6v-0.004Vo)/ 2k

    BY KCL
    then 25(i)-Vo/40k - Vo/10k = 0
    then substitute
    25((6v-0.004Vo)/2l)) -Vo/40k -Vo/10k = 0
    Therefore

    Vo = 428.57V

    Hmm :confused: still not the right answer ?
     
  6. Aug 30, 2011 #5

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Or perhaps it's the right answer to the wrong problem :smile:

    Your calculations appear to be sound for the circuit shown. Can you verify that the circuit matches the problem given?
     
  7. Aug 30, 2011 #6
    i double check the given here in my copy.. the circuit is right.. but not so sure about my computation :tongue:

    so what do you think.. maybe the answer given by my prof is wrong? Vo = -50V :confused:
     
  8. Aug 30, 2011 #7

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    As I said, your computation looks correct for the circuit given. It is possible that your Prof was incorrect (or was misinterpreted?).
     
  9. Aug 30, 2011 #8
    Ahm ok :approve: Thx for Helping me :smile:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook