Circuit Analysis : Using Kirchoffs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem involving Kirchhoff's laws, specifically focusing on finding the voltage Vo in a given circuit diagram. The original poster presents an attempt to solve the problem, referencing a specific voltage source and resistances in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's equations and the source of the voltage values used. There is a focus on verifying the circuit setup and the application of Kirchhoff's laws. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of the voltage source and the calculations leading to the derived values of Vo.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and questioning the correctness of the given answer from the professor. Some participants suggest that the computations appear sound based on the circuit presented, while others express uncertainty about the original problem's parameters.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential discrepancy between the original poster's understanding of the circuit and the professor's provided answer. The original poster has made edits to the circuit values during the discussion, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the problem setup.

gatsbycollege
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/939/95788682.jpg
Find Vo
Vo = -50V (given answer by my prof)

Homework Equations


KVL
(Series) V=V1+V2
(Parallel) V=V1=V2
KCL
Current toward the node = Current Away from the node
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



i tried to solve for the i in the left ckt
i=(6v+0.004Vo)/2k <-- 6v is in series with 0.004Vo (i think)

by KCL at the right
25i - (Vo/40k) - (Vo/10k) = 0 <--- 40k and 10k is in parallel so Voltage would be equal
the substitute terms

25((6v+0.004Vo)/2k) - (Vo/40k) - (Vo/10k) = 0
Vo = 1kV <--- actually is not right XD
so there it is,, what did i miss?

Edit : (50v change to 6v)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the 6V come from in your equations? The diagram shows a 50V source.

Also, the potential across the 2k resistor appears to be 50V - 0.004Vo. "Walk" around the loop in the direction of the current and it goes: 50V - i*2k - 0.004Vo = 0.
 
gneill said:
Where does the 6V come from in your equations? The diagram shows a 50V source.

Also, the potential across the 2k resistor appears to be 50V - 0.004Vo. "Walk" around the loop in the direction of the current and it goes: 50V - i*2k - 0.004Vo = 0.
Aw.. my mistake,, 50v at the left should be 6v Sorry :-p

Edit: So there it is i changed the circuit.
 
by referring to what you said sir,

i= (6v-0.004Vo)/ 2k

BY KCL
then 25(i)-Vo/40k - Vo/10k = 0
then substitute
25((6v-0.004Vo)/2l)) -Vo/40k -Vo/10k = 0
Therefore

Vo = 428.57V

Hmm :confused: still not the right answer ?
 
gatsbycollege said:
by referring to what you said sir,

i= (6v-0.004Vo)/ 2k

BY KCL
then 25(i)-Vo/40k - Vo/10k = 0
then substitute
25((6v-0.004Vo)/2l)) -Vo/40k -Vo/10k = 0
Therefore

Vo = 428.57V

Hmm :confused: still not the right answer ?

Or perhaps it's the right answer to the wrong problem :smile:

Your calculations appear to be sound for the circuit shown. Can you verify that the circuit matches the problem given?
 
gneill said:
Or perhaps it's the right answer to the wrong problem :smile:

Your calculations appear to be sound for the circuit shown. Can you verify that the circuit matches the problem given?

i double check the given here in my copy.. the circuit is right.. but not so sure about my computation :-p

so what do you think.. maybe the answer given by my prof is wrong? Vo = -50V :confused:
 
gatsbycollege said:
i double check the given here in my copy.. the circuit is right.. but not so sure about my computation :-p

so what do you think.. maybe the answer given by my prof is wrong? Vo = -50V :confused:

As I said, your computation looks correct for the circuit given. It is possible that your Prof was incorrect (or was misinterpreted?).
 
gneill said:
As I said, your computation looks correct for the circuit given. It is possible that your Prof was incorrect (or was misinterpreted?).

Ahm ok :approve: Thx for Helping me :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K