Circular Motion: Friction, Centripetal Force & Polygons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of friction in circular motion, particularly in the context of a vehicle negotiating turns along the sides of a polygon, such as an octagon. Participants explore the relationship between friction, centripetal force, and the direction of forces involved in turning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that friction acts outward, opposing the change in direction when negotiating a turn, and questions where the centripetal force is directed.
  • Another participant counters that friction acts inward, pulling the vehicle through the turn and opposing the inertia that would otherwise cause it to move in a straight line.
  • A third participant proposes that the perpendicular component of friction is responsible for maintaining circular motion, emphasizing the role of inertia in determining the direction of friction.
  • There is a discussion about the effect of the angle of the turn on the role of friction, with some suggesting that friction can be ignored at small angles as the polygon approaches a circle.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that friction can be ignored, asserting that friction is essential for maintaining any circular path.
  • One participant acknowledges a shift in their understanding, stating that the inward direction of friction was validated, despite initial skepticism.
  • A later reply emphasizes that insufficient friction would result in the vehicle skidding out of the circular path due to inertia, highlighting the necessity of radial frictional force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express conflicting views on the direction and role of friction in circular motion, with no consensus reached on whether friction can be ignored at small angles or the validity of the initial claims regarding friction acting outward.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different scenarios involving varying angles and radii of turns, which may influence their interpretations of the forces at play. The discussion remains open to interpretation regarding the dynamics of friction and centripetal force.

govinda
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi guys .
i read that friction can be attributed to the centripetal force that causes circular motion . now suppose we consider our circle as a polygon , say an octagon and a bike or car was going along one of the sides of this octagon if i were to negotiate a turn of an angle of 45 degrees in order to go onto the next side of the octagon . so it urn the steering wheel and the tyres turn . now friction acts outwards opposing the change in directon and i think as the polygon approaches a circle this frictional force would be radial outward . something like a centrifugal force .. so where is the force directeed toward the centre of the circle . from my hand as i turn the steering wheel?
thanks
govinda
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got it backwards.

Friction is acting inwards. Friction is what pulls you through the turn. Newton says that your motion would continue in a straight line if left alone. The linear direction is the direction that friction is opposing, not your circular direction.
 
Hi govinda, I too have been wondering about how exactly is friction the cause circular motion. Here's what I think. I hope someone could comment (i.e. validate or invalidate) on my drawing too.

In the drawing, the perpendicular component of friction is responsible for the circular motion. Because of inertia, the speed remains in the same direction, hence the direction of the force of friction.

( I drew bike tires as seen from above )
 

Attachments

  • turn.jpg
    turn.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 554
quasar987 said:
Hi govinda, I too have been wondering about how exactly is friction the cause circular motion. Here's what I think. I hope someone could comment (i.e. validate or invalidate) on my drawing too.

In the drawing, the perpendicular component of friction is responsible for the circular motion. Because of inertia, the speed remains in the same direction, hence the direction of the force of friction.

( I drew bike tires as seen from above )


nice explanation quasar .. so friction acts linearly .. friction while negotiating the turn can be ignored when the angle is small as the polygon approaches a circle ... also as the turn becomes less the friction opposing linear motion does infact become radially inward (look at the pic and reduce the angle).so in my opinion hypothesis validated.
 
govinda said:
... so friction acts linearly ..
I'm not quite sure what you are implying with this statement, but I guess it is a moot point.

govinda said:
...friction while negotiating the turn can be ignored when the angle is small as the polygon approaches a circle
If you want to continue in a circular path of any kind, friction is not going to be ignored. Again, friction is what is responsible for the circular path.

govinda said:
... also as the turn becomes less the friction opposing linear motion does infact become radially inward (look at the pic and reduce the angle).so in my opinion hypothesis validated.
If you are doing a comparisson between differing circle radii, then you are somewhat correct, if not a bit misleading. You are referring to the resulatant frictional force, are you not? As the radius of the turn increases, the centripetal force (due to friction) decreases and the resultant frictional force approaches an equal value of the tangential friction (opposing the linear velocity). However, I still do not see how you can say that your initial notion of friction acting outward can be "validated"

now friction acts outwards opposing the change in directon and i think as the polygon approaches a circle this frictional force would be radial outward
 
Last edited:
fred,
by validated i meant that the theory of frictional force acting inward was validated which i had a problem with accepting initially ...
 
When going about in circular motion, one will tend to want to leave the circular path on a tangent due to inertia. However in order to combat this, a radial frictional force is required. If the ground was slippery and there was little friction the bike would not be able to continue in the circular motion because it would skid out and leave tangent to the circular path since the frictional force directed towards the radius is not strong enough to compete with the inertia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K