Clarification of spinor solutions in Srednicki

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Higgsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinor Srednicki
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Dirac equation using spinor solutions as presented in Srednicki's text. Specifically, the solution form $$ \textbf{$\Psi$} (x) = u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx}$$ is analyzed when substituted into the Dirac equation $$ (-i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}+m)\textbf{$\Psi$}=0$$. The resulting expression $$ (p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + (-p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx} = 0 $$ raises questions about the significance of the term $$p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu}$$. Participants are encouraged to explore the implications of this term further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its components
  • Familiarity with spinor solutions in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of gamma matrices and their properties
  • Basic concepts of four-momentum in relativistic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the role of gamma matrices in the Dirac equation
  • Study the derivation of spinor solutions in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of four-momentum in relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Examine examples of plugging solutions into the Dirac equation for different scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, students studying relativistic quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Higgsy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
On page 235 of srednicki (print) it says to plug a solution of the form $$ \textbf{$\Psi$} (x) = u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx}$$ into the dirac equation $$ (-i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}+m)\textbf{$\Psi$}=0 $$

To get

$$(p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)u(\textbf{p})e^{ipx} + (-p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + m)v(\textbf{p})e^{-ipx} = 0 $$

I'm wondering what the reasoning for this term is (not wrt negative or positive but simply why p) $$p_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try just plugging it into the Dirac equation? What did you get?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K