Clarifying the Basics of the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment

Click For Summary
The Millikan oil drop experiment involved oil droplets that could be either positively or negatively charged, and the charge on the plates varied depending on the battery's orientation. While some sources suggest that the oil droplets and the bottom plate were positive, the consensus is that most droplets studied were negatively charged due to their greater mobility and prevalence. Millikan's findings indicate that the electric field between the plates is more critical than the specific charges of the droplets or plates. The electric field strength can be calculated using the potential difference divided by the spacing between the plates. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the experiment's conclusions.
sera97
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the Millikan oil drop experiment, was the oil particles positively or negatively charged. and what were the charges of the plates. My textbook and what my gr.10 notes say is that the oil droplets and the bottom plate were positive, but every source online says that they were negative and that makes sense to me. Does it work either way? or have I been taught completely wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The drops investigated could be either positive or negative, and the charge on the bottom plate could be either positive or negative, depending on which way he decided to put the battery.

In fact, Millikan writes, "On account of the slightly greater mobility of the negative ion, and also on account of the somewhat greater numbers in which they occur, we found, in general, a greater tendency of the drops to take up negative than positive charges. In view, therefore, of the greater ease with which negative drops could be held for long intervals without being lost to the plates most of the drops studied have been of negative sign." But his data includes drops with both types of charge.
 
Last edited:
Thank you!
 
I think it should be pointed out that it is the Field between the plates that you need to know and not the "charges". And PD divided by the spacing would give you that.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K