Class Schedule Opinions: Comparing Option I & II

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of two class schedules for an upcoming semester, focusing on their relevance and preparation for graduate school in mathematics or physics. Participants explore the implications of each option on their academic and career goals, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty between two class schedules, noting that both seem equally beneficial for grad school preparation.
  • Another participant suggests that Option II is more suitable for grad school in mathematics or physics, prompting a question about the original poster's goals.
  • The original poster indicates a preference for graduate studies in either math or physics, with a current leaning towards math while remaining open to advanced physics.
  • Some participants argue that Abstract Algebra and Real Analysis are essential for math grad school, while advanced Mechanics and E&M are crucial for physics grad school.
  • Optics is mentioned as more applicable to industry rather than necessary for physics grad school, suggesting it could be taken as an elective.
  • Graph Theory is noted as interesting but not directly applicable to physics grad school, although it may be beneficial for math grad school.
  • One participant reflects on the nature of the courses in Option I, suggesting that some may not adequately prepare them for future studies but could still be valuable for graduation requirements.
  • A later reply mentions a conversation with a graduate advisor recommending Option I with an additional course in Differential Equations, indicating a preference for that schedule.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on which class schedule is more advantageous for graduate school, with no consensus reached on a preferred option. Some emphasize the importance of specific courses for their intended fields, while others consider personal interests and course difficulty.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the relevance of courses based on their future academic goals, but there are unresolved questions regarding the adequacy of certain classes for preparation. The discussion reflects individual experiences with advisors and course selection processes.

Charles Stark
Messages
31
Reaction score
5
I honestly am split down the middle on which class schedule to choose for the upcoming semester. I feel like both would prepare me for grad school with option II a little bit more but both are equal in my eyes. Just wanted to get some opinions on what you might think. Option I:

-Intro to Graph Theory
-Foundations of Geometry
-Modern Physics with Lab
-Physical OpticsOption II:

-Abstract Algebra I
-Real Analysis II
-Mechanics I (the first part of the advanced level)
-E&M (the advanced level) What didn't help is my advisor said they are both equal in terms of requirements. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Option II for grad school in mathematics or physics.
What are your goals?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Stark
Ultimate goal is grad school for either Math or Physics. Right now I'm leaning more towards math but I still want to take more advanced physics in case it sparks enough of a passion to pursue it.
 
For Grad school in math the Abstract algebra and Real Analysis are going to be essential.
For Grad school in physics, the advanced mechanics, and EM are essential.

Optics is more applicable to industry. But for your goals save that for a free elective. This is not a necessary course for Physics grad school.

Graph Theory while interesting (being it's mostly topological nature I find it fascinating) is not going to be directly applicable to Physics grad school. Will be a good course to take for math grad school, but not over an analysis course or abstract algebra course.

If you have time try to take some grad courses as well.
Others here may urge you to take some CS for employment reasons. Which in this case graph theory could be of use (at least we studied it in a discrete math course for comp sci).

Are there any other reasons to prefer option 1 over 2 or the other way that are unrelated to grad school goals?
 
Not anything that comes to mind right away.

Intro to Graph Theory is a blended course (both undergraduate and graduate) but I've been learning it and reading research papers and it seems like a subject I could learn on my own.

Foundations of Geometry is more like a history/proof class. Which is helpful in terms of proof practice and would count towards graduation but doesn't really prep me, I think, for anything beyond.

Modern Physics is a prerequisite for a lot of classes. It would give me more options later on.

Optics was the only thing left based on schedule conflicts but sounded interesting. I think option II would be more of a challenge. Both Abstract and Real analysis are heavy into proofs and require lots of work. The upper level physics classes are equivalent in the amount of time I would need to put in, however I think it would be time well spent. I got a new advisor which wasn't fun because he didn't seem to know much about how the grad programs run and couldn't recommend what classes would be better. I guessed on which ones would be more helpful based on the topics covered. I might try to contact some professors I've had to see what they think.
 
I talked to a Graduate advisor and he said I should take option 1 with the addition of Differential equations 2. Then next semester I will be able to take Statistical and Thermal Physics, Abstract Algebra I, Matrix Theory and Quantum Mechanics. All is good!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K