Classical electrodynamics -Good conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of electromagnetic waves at a vacuum-metal interface, specifically when the metal is a good conductor with a conductivity of approximately 10^8 Siemens per meter. The key equation for the time-averaged Poynting vector is presented as S_{avg} = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} E_{i}^{2} in vacuum and S_{avg} = \frac{1}{4} \sigma_{0} \delta E_{t}^{2} e^{-\frac{2z}{\delta}} inside the metal, where δ is defined as \sqrt{\frac{2}{\mu \omega \sigma_{0}}}. To maximize the fraction of incident power deposited beyond a depth d, it is essential to select a frequency that results in a skin depth greater than d.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with Poynting vector calculations
  • Knowledge of skin depth in conductive materials
  • Basic principles of refractive index and its relation to conductivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the skin depth formula \delta = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\mu \omega \sigma_{0}}}
  • Explore the relationship between frequency and power deposition in conductive materials
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of the function \omega e^{-\omega} to find its maximum
  • Investigate the effects of varying conductivity on electromagnetic wave behavior in metals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and researchers working with conductive materials and wave interactions.

cowrebellion
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question given is an electromagnetic wave incident on a vacuum metal interface. The wave is incident normally. We're given that the metal is a good conductor i.e. [tex]\omega \tau <<1[/tex] where [tex]\tau[/tex] is the collision time of the metal and omega is the angular frequency. The metal is also non-magnetic and the conductivity is of the order of [tex]10^8[/tex] Siemens per metre

The first part is easy enough it's just to show that T the transmissivity is equal to 2/n where n is the real part of N the refractive index.

The part that has me stumped is to find the value of [tex]\omega[/tex] so that the fraction of incident power deposited beyond a depth d is maximised


Homework Equations



I think the relevant equation is the poynting vector.

I'm taking the time averaged poynting vector for a wave in vacuum as [tex]S_{avg} = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}} E_{i}^{2}[/tex] and inside the metal I assume the form[tex]S_{avg} = \frac{1}{4} \sigma_{0} \delta E_{t}^{2} e^{\frac{-2 z}{\delta}[/tex]

Where delta is given as[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2}{\mu \omega \sigma_{0}}}[/tex]

I'm also taking[tex]n=\frac{c}{\omega \delta}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by saying that since the time averaged poynting vectors is independent of x and y in both case we can say
[tex]\int S_{avg} dA=S_{avg} A[/tex]

Using this I divided the power incident on the surface by the power incident on hte same area but at a distance d below the surface to obtain[tex]\frac{\delta \sigma_{0}}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\epsilon}}\frac{E_{t}}{E_{i}}\frac{E_{t}}{E_{i}}e^{\frac{-2 d}{\delta}}[/tex]but with this I differentiate w.r.t. omega and I can't obtain an answer? It's been bugging me for a while so I hope someone can help me out. Hope the format of the question is ok It's my first time posting here. =D

edit: I forgot to say that I replaced {E_{t}/E_{i}}^2 with 2/n I tried changing the latex code but it won't edit for some reason.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have already assumed that the field decays exponentially on the scale of the skin depth

[tex]\delta=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\mu \omega \sigma_{0}}}[/tex]

But this already gives you the answer: to maximize power deposition beyond d, choose a frequency to make the skin depth greater than d.
 
That makes sense but the question asks for a specific value of the frequency. Initially I thought I'd obtain an equation of the form [tex]\omega e^{-\omega}[/tex] which has a definite maximum value.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K