Classical Eletrodynamics, Jackson

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andreol263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Jackson
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and experiences of reading "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson, focusing on the mathematical rigor, the exercises, and the overall comprehension of the material. Participants share their thoughts on prerequisites and the nature of the content in the book.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the perceived difficulty of the book and seeks advice on prerequisites for smoother reading.
  • Another participant mentions that the mathematics in Jackson's book is "sadistic," indicating a belief in its challenging nature.
  • There is a suggestion that engaging with end-of-chapter exercises is crucial for building a real understanding of the material.
  • A participant notes that the first chapter mainly covers basic electrostatics concepts, which they feel familiar with due to prior study of Griffith's book.
  • One contributor argues that even familiar concepts can present challenges and emphasizes the importance of not underestimating problem sets, which may contain conceptual traps.
  • Another participant praises Jackson's book for its comprehensiveness and suggests starting with a fully relativistic treatment, recommending the second edition for its use of CGS units.
  • There is an acknowledgment that while the problems in the book are tough, they significantly enhance understanding, with a caution against discouragement.
  • One participant notes that the book can be abstract at times, with large logical jumps between equations, but finds the topics engaging, including introductions to QED and Solid State physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the difficulty of the book, the importance of exercises, and the clarity of explanations. There is no consensus on the overall accessibility of the material or the best approach to studying it.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential for conceptual traps in problem sets, indicating that prior knowledge may not always suffice. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the material and differing opinions on the effectiveness of Jackson's pedagogical approach.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in advanced electrodynamics, particularly those considering studying Jackson's book or seeking insights on tackling challenging physics texts.

Andreol263
Messages
77
Reaction score
15
I've started reading the book on the title, but exists so fuzz here about this book and it's scared me a bit, I'm in the middle of chapter 2 right now, and nothing difficult appeared to me in this moment, what are the requeriments to read this book smothly until the end?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been told the mathematics in Jackson is sadistic.
 
Have you started doing the end-of-chapter exercises yet?
 
No..
 
If you're not doing any exercises you're not going to build any real understanding of the material.
 
It's because i haven't finished the chapter 2 yet, but i will do the exercises, chapter 1 it's only the derivation of basic concepts of eletrostatics, there's nothing new in that, i have studied Griffith book...
 
Problems involving even old concepts can provide opportunities to improve your understanding. Also just because you think you can "see" your way to a solution does mean that you can solve the problem for some problems are wrought with conceptual traps and complexities that will thwart your efforts. At this stage in the development of a subject the problem sets should not be simply a mere repetition of the concepts of the text. Use the athletes routine of "warming up" before you do the heavy lifting.
 
Jackson's book is very good and quite comprehensive. For my taste, I'd start much earlier with a fully relativistic treatment and I'd recommend the 2nd edition, because it's written fully in the good old CGS units (unfortunately in the Gaussian and not in modern rationalized Heaviside-Lorentz units, but it's better than SI in any case, because SI units destroy the elegance and inner logic of the theory unnecessarily).

The problems are tough, but solving tough problems adds a lot to your understanding of the subject. Only don't get discouraged too soon. As I said, the problems are tough!
 
Yeah, i agree, but sometimes the book can go quite abstract in explanation, with huge logic jumbs between the equations,but nothing impossible at the moment and the subjects in the book appears to be quite cool too, with some introduction to QED and Solid State.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K