Classical Limit and Angular frequency

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in classical mechanics concerning circular motion in an arbitrary central potential V(r). The original poster attempts to show the relationship w = dE/dL, where E represents energy, L is angular momentum, and w is angular frequency, particularly in the context of classical and quantum mechanics correspondence for large circular orbits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of taking the derivative of energy with respect to angular momentum and question the role of the potential in this context. There is also a consideration of whether the total energy expression is correctly formulated.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights regarding the constancy of radius in circular motion and its implications for the potential energy. There is an exploration of how changes in angular momentum might affect the potential, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the potential is a function of radius, which remains constant for circular orbits, leading to questions about the assumptions made in the problem setup. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the variables involved.

keniwas
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that in classical mechanics, for circular motion, in an arbitrary central potential
V (r), one has w = dE/dL where E is the energy, L is the angular momentum, and w is the
angular frequency of motion around the orbit.

This is the basis for a problem on understanding the correspondence between classical and quantum mechanis in the limit of large circular orbits (i.e. akin to Bohr's atom).

Homework Equations


Total Energy of the system in Circular Motion
[tex]E=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{r}^2+\frac{L^2}{mr^2})+V(\vec{r})[/tex]
Where
[tex]L=r^2\omega m[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


Once I got the energy in terms of angular momentum, I simply took the derivative with respect to L, however this leaves me with the angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex] and an additional term from the potential (which I can't find any argument as to why it should be zero in this case...)
[tex]dE/dL = 0+\frac{L}{mr^2}+\frac{dV}{dL}=\omega+\frac{dV}{dL}[/tex]

I am clearly missing somthing important in the problem... is my form for the total energy of the system wrong? or is there somthing special about the central potential I am missing?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think, simply, as its a circular motion, the r has to be constant making the potential constant. Which makes the derivative zero.

PS--Be a bit more clear in your problem, as I think the [tex]\dot{r}^2[/tex] is different from the other "r" in the system (though it wouldn't matter for the problem). are you considering a point mass?
 
It would be a point mass (or as close as you can get to one as an electron). The [tex]\dot{r}^2[/tex] would be the velocity in the radial direction (i.e. a change in the radius of your circular orbit).

I thought something similar to the logic regarding a fixed circular orbit, however if I change my angular momentum will that not nessecarily correspond to a change in the potential of the system? Since a change in angular momentum would change the effective radius?
 
For a circular orbit, the radius must be constant, so [itex]\dot{r}=0[/itex].

Your potential is given in the functional form [itex]V=V(r)[/itex] suggesting it depends only only the radius, which is constant for a circular orbit

[tex]\frac{\partial V}{\partial L}=\frac{\partial r}{\partial L}\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}=(0)\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}[/tex]
 
Thank you for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K