Classifaction of equilibrium points for a Hamiltonian System

[rmiller70015]

Homework Statement

For the system:
<br /> \frac{dx}{dt}=x\cos{xy} <br /> \: \:<br /> \frac{dy}{dt}=-y\cos{xy}
(a) is Hamiltonian with the function:
<br /> H(x,y)=\sin{xy}
(b) Sketch the level sets of H, and
(c) sketch the phase portrait of the system. Include a description of all equilibrium points and any saddle connections.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\frac{\partial H}{\partial y}=y\cos{xy}=-g \\<br /> \frac{\partial H}{\partial x}=x\cos{xy}=f
So the function is Hamiltonian. I see that the equilibrium points are (0,0) and (±√π/2,±√π/2) by inspection. The problem I have is that the second set of equilibria have complex roots, but I don't see any of that behavior when I graph the phase portrait with pplane.

 

[Mark44]

Homework Statement

For the system:
<br /> \frac{dx}{dt}=x\cos{xy}<br /> \: \:<br /> \frac{dy}{dt}=-y\cos{xy}
(a) is Hamiltonian with the function:
<br /> H(x,y)=\sin{xy}
(b) Sketch the level sets of H, and
(c) sketch the phase portrait of the system. Include a description of all equilibrium points and any saddle connections.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\frac{\partial H}{\partial y}=y\cos{xy}=-g \\<br /> \frac{\partial H}{\partial x}=x\cos{xy}=f
So the function is Hamiltonian. I see that the equilibrium points are (0,0) and (±√π/2,±√π/2) by inspection.

The equation $\cos(xy) = 0$ has many solutions of the form $xy = (2k + 1)\frac{\pi}2$, with k an integer. The point you show is just one equilibrium point.

The problem I have is that the second set of equilibria have complex roots

How are you getting this (the complex roots)?

, but I don't see any of that behavior when I graph the phase portrait with pplane.

 

[rmiller70015]

I didn't approximate so I may have made a mistake typing it into my calculator. I'll approximate and see if I get something else. Maybe that's the problem.

 

[Mark44]

I didn't approximate so I may have made a mistake typing it into my calculator.

I used plain old algebra, so I don't see how using approximations would be helpful.

I'll approximate and see if I get something else. Maybe that's the problem.

 

[rmiller70015]

I get a Jacobian matrix of:
<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \cos{xy}-y\sin{xy} &amp; -x^2\sin{xy} \\<br /> xy\sin{xy} &amp; xy\sin{xy}-\cos{xy}<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
So then my matrix for that second point becomes:
<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> -\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} &amp; -\frac{\pi}{2} \\<br /> \frac{\pi}{2} &amp; \frac{\pi}{2}<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
Then using the trace and determinant I get:
<br /> \lambda^2-\Bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigg)\lambda-\Bigg(\Big(\frac{\pi}{2}\Big)^\frac{3}{2}-\Big(\frac{\pi}{2}\Big)^2\Bigg)
So then the quadradic would be:
<br /> \frac{\Bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigg)\pm\sqrt{\Bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigg)^2+4\Bigg(\big(\frac{\pi}{2}\big)^\frac{3}{2}-\big(\frac{\pi}{2}\big)^2\Bigg)}}{2}

That is why I wanted to approximate and when I do, I still get a spiral, but this time a source. I used 1.51 as an approximation for π/2 and 1.25 for√π/2 then my approximation for b in the quadradic was 0.32 and c was 0.50. I hope I'm not completely missing something here.