Closed, bounded but not compact

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 5K views
bender2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let |e-x-e-y| be a metric, x,y over R.
let X=[0,infinity) be a metric space.
prove that X is closed, bounded but not compact.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



there is no problem for me to show that X is closed and bounded. but how do I prove it's not compact?
I assume it must be done with the use of Cauchy sequence. if xn is Cauchy but it's not convergent then X is not complete and then it's not compact. but how do I right it down in algebraical form?

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm afraid i don't know how to do it. can you show me please?

and is the way with Cauchy sequence correct?
 
You can use the form of compactness with regard to subsequences. For every sequence x_{n} in the metric space then there is a convergent subsequence.
 
Normally one would prove that [itex][0, \infty)[/itex], with the usual metric, is not compact, directly from the definition, "every open cover contains a finite subcover", by looking at the "open cover" [itex]U_n= [0, n)[/itex]. Are those sets open in this metric?
 
Last edited by a moderator: