Closed form for geometricish series (index squared in the exponent)?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a closed form for the series ∑_{k=0}^n x^{k^2}. It is noted that no referenced closed form exists for the finite sum, while the infinite sum has a known closed form involving the Jacobi theta function. The user seeks a lower bound for a modified sum that includes terms like x^k and x^{k(k+1)/2}, particularly as n approaches infinity. The user expresses a need for a lower bound that reflects the initial increasing behavior of the sum before it decreases. The conversation highlights the challenge of deriving useful bounds for these series.
lasindi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Closed form for "geometricish" series (index squared in the exponent)?

Hi all,

Is there a nice closed form for the following series?

\sum_{k=0}^n x^{k^2}

Even a decently tight upper bound and lower bound would be nice (obviously it is bounded by the corresponding geometric series \sum x^k, but is there anything better?).

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi !
As far as I know, there is no referenced closed form for the finite sum x^k² , k=0 to n.
The closed form for the infinite sum x^k² k=0 to infinity, with -1<x<1, is =(theta(0 , x)+1)/2 , involving the Jacobi theta function.
 
Thanks for the reply! It turned out that the plain old geometric upper bound was sufficient for what I was doing before, but now I need a lower bound for the following sum for x \in (0,1).

<br /> \sum_{k=0}^n [x^k + x^{k(k+1)/2} - 1]<br />

Clearly as n goes to infinity, this sum goes to negative infinity, but first it will increase with n and then decrease. I want a lower bound that captures that beginning increasing part. I don't really understand much about the Jacobi theta function so I'm not sure if it would be useful here too...

Essentially what I need is a closed form lower bound so that I can solve an inequality for n.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K