Co-efficient of Static Friction Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The coefficient of static friction for a 5.0 kg rubber block on a floor is 0.72, requiring an applied force of 35 Newtons to initiate sliding. The calculation is based on the formula: coefficient of static friction = Friction Force / Surface Normal Force, where the surface normal force equals the weight of the object (49.05 N). The discrepancy with the book's answer of 106 Newtons suggests a misunderstanding or error, as the calculated force aligns with the established physics principles. The applied force must be horizontal to effectively overcome the static friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of static friction and its coefficient
  • Ability to perform basic physics calculations involving force and weight
  • Familiarity with the concept of surface normal force
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of static friction and its applications in real-world scenarios
  • Study the differences between static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Learn about the impact of surface materials on frictional forces
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, such as friction in inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of friction and force calculations.

Sabellic
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the coefficient of static friction for a 5.0 kg rubber block on a floor is 0.72, how much force is needed to start it sliding?

Mass=5.0kg
Co-efficient of Static Friction=0.72
Friction=?


Homework Equations


coefficient of static friction = Friction Force/Surface Normal Force (equal to the weight of the object)


The Attempt at a Solution



0.72=Friction/(5)*(9.81)
0.72=Friction/49.05
0.72*49.05=Friction
35N=Friction

Therefore, an applied force of at least 35 Newtons is needed to overcome the Friction Force and start the object moving. But the answer in the book gave me 106 Newtons. I don't know how that was arrived at...but strangely enough 35 * 3 = 106.

Thanks in advance for clearing up the matter for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you are correct and the book is wrong. (I assume the force is meant to be applied horizontally.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K