P K Pillai
- 23
- 0
The downwash from a helicopter rotor, if passed over a suitable surface below the rotor could produce a Coanda Effect. Will this influence lift?
Coanda Effect: Helicopter Rotor Downwash & Lift
- Thread starter P K Pillai
- Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 5K views
P K Pillai
- 23
- 0
Thanks.I have insufficient knowledge of the aeronautical sciences to comment on ground effects or on the shape & size of the surface/s that will generate a Coanda.Just a thought experiment.
( formerly VU2BXD ).
( formerly VU2BXD ).
- 3,482
- 1,293
The downwash is already pointing down. Using the Coandă effect to redirect the flow is only going to reduce the lift, though you could get some thrust out of it in return. This is already what the blades are designed to do, however, without any additional surface, so including a surface like that really gains you nothing and, due to the second law of thermodynamics, actually loses you some.
2025 Award
- 17,118
- 10,627
The lift generated by a helicopter is created by the blade airfoil section, not by the down stream draft.
Any down draft drag on the fuselage is wasteful, as it will drag the helicopter body downwards.
A helicopter blade has very little, if any, twist along it's length, so only a short section of the blade is working at optimum efficiency. That enables a helicopter to get lift from both sides of the rotor when flying horizontally. But it also means that the maximum down draft is at a different distance away from the fuselage on each side and is airspeed dependent.
It would be quite hard to predict where that down draft would be under operating conditions.
Any down draft drag on the fuselage is wasteful, as it will drag the helicopter body downwards.
A helicopter blade has very little, if any, twist along it's length, so only a short section of the blade is working at optimum efficiency. That enables a helicopter to get lift from both sides of the rotor when flying horizontally. But it also means that the maximum down draft is at a different distance away from the fuselage on each side and is airspeed dependent.
It would be quite hard to predict where that down draft would be under operating conditions.
- 2,001
- 612
Baluncore said:
Those aren't really independent - the airfoil produces a downdraft (it's how it works), and that is why lift is generated. Boneh3ad is correct - any redirection of this downwash is going to reduce the lift generated.
2025 Award
- 17,118
- 10,627
Nothing is truly independent. The downwash is a reaction to the lift generated by the airfoil.cjl said:
Yes, Boneh3ad is correct, I never doubted it. Increasing lift by interfering with the downwash is the same as trying to lift yourself by your own boot laces, or a snake eating it's own tail.cjl said:
It becomes obvious when you consider the downwash as an historical artefact of the blade's lift, rather than implementing a postmodernist analysis/confusion of everything being inseparably connected.
- 3,482
- 1,293
Baluncore said:
It's really more of a chicken and egg kind of thing. One doesn't really "cause" the other (lift and downwash, that is). Rather, you simply can't have one without the other. They are simply the opposite ends of Newton's laws.
- 6,999
- 299
That is not always true, for example, the increase in lift when hovering in ground effect.Baluncore said:
But I agree the OP's idea is very unlikely to work.
Baluncore said:
You seem to be contradicting yourself thereBaluncore said:
2025 Award
- 17,118
- 10,627
I agree that lift will be dependent on air density and that “ground effect” can therefore provide increased support to an aircraft when the downdraft flow downstream is impeded by something more fixed than clear air. Ground effect can save even more energy when an aircraft lands on the ground and stops it's engines.
Science employs a reductionist approach to analyse a complex universe.
If things were truly independent there would be more than one universe.
Only by modelling simplistic closed hypothetical universes, is science possible.
P.S. The egg came first, then the chicken.
The chicken is the best way eggs have of reproducing themselves.
Science is the contradiction.AlephZero said:
Science employs a reductionist approach to analyse a complex universe.
If things were truly independent there would be more than one universe.
Only by modelling simplistic closed hypothetical universes, is science possible.
P.S. The egg came first, then the chicken.
The chicken is the best way eggs have of reproducing themselves.
P K Pillai
- 23
- 0
Layout
Layout
Layout
P K Pillai
- 23
- 0
Watch this