Coding & GF(2): Understanding Logic in a Field

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coding
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of polynomials in the Galois Field GF(2). It establishes that in GF(2), the polynomial 3xy^5 reduces to xy due to the property that x+x=0, while the polynomial \frac{1}{2}x^2y cannot be simplified meaningfully because 1/2 is undefined in GF(2). The key takeaway is that in GF(2), x^2 is equivalent to x, and the concept of inverses does not apply to 0, reinforcing the unique characteristics of arithmetic in this field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galois Fields, specifically GF(2)
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions versus polynomials
  • Knowledge of basic field theory and properties of arithmetic in finite fields
  • Concept of polynomial reduction in modular arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Galois Fields, focusing on GF(2) operations
  • Explore polynomial functions and their applications in finite fields
  • Learn about modular arithmetic and its implications in field theory
  • Investigate the concept of inverses in different mathematical structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, computer scientists working with error-correcting codes, and anyone interested in the applications of Galois Fields in cryptography and coding theory.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
This came up in my logic course.

The professor writes that in GF(2), the polynomials [tex]3xy^5[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{2}x^2y[/tex] respectively can be reduced to [tex]3xy[/tex] and [tex]xy[/tex].

I understand that [tex]y^5=(y^2)(y^2)y=(1)(1)y=y[/tex], but also in GF(2), for any x, we have x+x=0. So it seems to me that [tex]3xy^5[/tex] can be further reduced to just [tex]xy[/tex] because we have [tex]3xy=xy+xy+xy=0+xy=xy[/tex].

For the other, I am clueless. Sure, [tex]x^2y=xy[/tex] because in GF(2), for any x, we have x²=x. But what happened to the 1/2? Worse, what is 1/2? It's the inverse of 2. And 2 is 1+1. But 1+1=0, and 0 has no inverse in a field.

What's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, just to make sure it's clear, we're talking about polynomial functions, not polynomials. The distinction is subtle, yet vital.

Secondly, [itex]x^2 \not\equiv 1[/itex]; I'm not sure where you got that idea. The right fact is [itex]x^2 \equiv x[/itex].

Thirdly, 1/2 doesn't make any sense in GF(2), because as you say, it's equivalent to 1/0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K