Coefficient of friction/ dynamics problem

Click For Summary
Lilly, with a mass of 45 kg and an initial speed of 7.00 m/s, encounters a rough patch of ice with a coefficient of friction of 0.0800, resulting in a frictional force of 35.2 N. Since Lilly is no longer moving at a constant speed, she experiences deceleration due to this frictional force, which is the only horizontal force acting on her. To find the net force, one must recognize that it is equal to the frictional force, allowing for the calculation of deceleration using Newton's Second Law. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding that the net force can be opposite to the direction of motion. This problem highlights the concept of friction as the sole force affecting motion in this scenario.
lah214
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lilly, whos mass is 45.0 kg, is ice skating with a constant speed of 7.00 m/s when she hits a rough patch of ice with a coefficient of friction of 0.0800. How long will it take before Lilly coasts to a stop?

m=45 kg
v=7m/s
coefficient of friction=.08

Homework Equations


equation 1: f=(coefficient of friction) x Normal Force
equation 2: v=u+at


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the force of friction is 35.2 N. I got this by using equation 1.

I know that Lilly is no longer going at a constant speed once she hits the rough patch of ice, so I know she is not in equilibrium, and therefore there must be some acceleration. In order to find the acceleration though, I must know the net force. I'm having trouble figuring out how to find that.

Can anyone please give me a hint on how to find the net force? Thanks in advance if you can!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you've found the friction, you've found the net force in the horizontal direction. Keep in mind that the frictional force points opposite to the motion of the skater, and therefore the skater will have a constant deceleration. You know that fk = ma by Newton's Second Law, now you can find the deceleration. Does that help?
 
Last edited:
ahh! yes, thank you soo much! I always forget that the net force is just friction, because it seems weird that's its going in the opposite direction as the net force. Thank you soo much!
 
it being the skater
 
lah214 said:
ahh! yes, thank you soo much! I always forget that the net force is just friction, because it seems weird that's its going in the opposite direction as the net force. Thank you soo much!

You're welcome. Just to make sure you have a handle on what's going on, remember that the net force is equal to ma. We juse happened to encounter a case where the friction was the only force acting in the horizontal direction. If someone was pushing the skater at the same time, we'd have to account for the friction and the pushing force in the net force equation.
 
Oh, yeah, that's actually what we've been doing in my class lately: the pushing at the same time. It had been some time since we had a problem where the only force was friction, hah, and I spent like 20 minutes trying to figure out how to do it. Anyway, thanks for all the help, I really appreciate it!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K