Coefficient of static friction of chain

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a uniform chain on a table, focusing on the coefficient of static friction. For part A, it is established that the chain will begin to slide off the table when at least 3.00m hangs over the edge, using the relationship between gravitational force and frictional force. Part B requires determining the chain's speed as it leaves the table, suggesting the application of Newton's second law with kinetic friction. Participants emphasize the importance of using general variables for clarity and accuracy in calculations. Overall, the thread provides guidance on applying physics principles to solve the problem effectively.
coolcat_ka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'm studying for an exam on Friday, and I'm stuck on this problem:

A uniform chain of length 8.00m initially lies stretched out on a horizontal table.
A. Assuming the coefficient of static friction between chain and table is 0.600, show that the chain will begin to slide off the table if at least 3.00m of it hangs over the edge of the table.
B. Determine the speed of the chain as its last link leaves the table, given that the coefficient of kinetic friction between the chain and the table is 0.400

Possible Equations to use?
m=z(y), y=dm/dx
dm/dt=dz/dt(y)

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi coolcat_ka! Welcome to PF!

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :smile:
 
ok, so for part a:

m=ro(x), where x=length.
m1=5rx, m2=3r0

F(gravity)-F(friction)=0

so m2g-mv(m1g)=0

(9.8)(3)r0-(9.8)(5.)(0.6)r0-0
3-(5(0.6))=0

And I believe that is how I can prove that the chain starts to slide, but I wanted to makesure I had done that correctly.

But I am stuck on part b - I don't even know where to start.
 
Hi coolcat_ka! :smile:
coolcat_ka said:
m=ro(x), where x=length.
m1=5rx, m2=3r0

F(gravity)-F(friction)=0

so m2g-mv(m1g)=0

(9.8)(3)r0-(9.8)(5.)(0.6)r0-0
3-(5(0.6))=0

Goodness, that's a mess! :redface:

(if you don't have a rho on your keyboard, then use something you do have … like k … it isn't compulsory to use rho for density :rolleyes:)

i] you could have divided your equation by g, so that you didn't have to put 9.8 in at all

ii] it would be better practice if you used a general amount, y, instead of 3, and then showed that y = 3.

For part b), use the same basic method (but with kinetic instead of static friction) … Newton's second law … weight of y less friction of (8-y) = mass times acceleration. :smile:
 
Excellent, thank you!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
114
Views
16K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K