I Coefficients in expansions of a vector potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differing coefficients in two expansions of a vector potential, specifically the constants (2π)^{3/2} and (2π)^{3}. These differences arise from varying conventions in the definition of the Fourier transform among authors, with physicists and mathematicians often adopting distinct normalization methods. The conversation highlights that these constants are primarily for convenience and do not affect the underlying physics. Additionally, it notes the importance of being aware of these conventions when interpreting texts in different fields. Ultimately, the constants are not a significant concern unless they involve dimensions.
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
Why the coefficients in expansions of a vector potential are different in different papers?
I have seen two expansions of a vector potential,

$$\mathbf A=\sum_\sigma \int \frac{d^3k}{(16 \pi^3 |\mathbf k|)^{1/2}} [\epsilon_\sigma(\mathbf k) \alpha_\sigma (\mathbf k) e^{i \mathbf k \cdot \mathbf x}+c.c.],$$
and
$$\mathbf A=\sum_\sigma \int \frac{d^3k}{ (2 \pi)^3(2 |\mathbf k|)^{1/2}} [\epsilon_\sigma(\mathbf k) \alpha_\sigma (\mathbf k) e^{i \mathbf k \cdot \mathbf x}+c.c.],$$
where ##\epsilon_\sigma## are polarizations, ##\alpha_\sigma (\mathbf k)## are amplitudes.

My problem is the two coefficients ## (2 \pi)^{3/2}## and ## (2 \pi)^3## in these two expressions, respectively. Why they are different?

I do not remember where I have read something about it, that it is related to the definition of Fourier transform.

Thanks for any hints.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
The constant coefficients don’t matter. They are only there for convenience. They are different because the two different authors disagreed on which was most convenient.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
It's just a question of conventions. You have as many normalization conventions in the Fourier mode decomposition of (quantum) fields you have authors of textbooks and papers (or even more ;-)).
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Dale
Physicists usually define the FT as ##f(x)=\int...F(k)##,and mathematicians
use ##f(x)=(2\pi)^{-1/2}\int##.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Well, there are many types of physicists and all define their FTs differently. Sometimes the convention changes even in different subfields of physics.

E.g., in non-relativistic quantum mechanics one usually defines the FT between position and momentum (or rather "wave-vector") representation in a symmetric way, i.e., as unitary transformations from ##\mathrm{L}^2 \rightarrow \mathrm{L}^2## (for 1D motion):
$$\psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} k \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \tilde{\psi}(k) \exp(\mathrm{i} k x) \; \Leftrightarrow \; \tilde{\psi}(k)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} x \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \psi(x) \exp(-\mathrm{i} k x).$$
In relativistic (Q)FT most physicists use
$$\psi(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} k \frac{1}{2 \pi} \tilde{\psi}(k) \exp(\mathrm{i} k x) \; \Leftrightarrow \; \tilde{\psi}(k)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} x \psi(x) \exp(-\mathrm{i} k x).$$
For the FT wrt. time vs. angular frequency you have the same conventions but with the opposite signs in the exponentials. That's because one usually has to solve wave equations and likes to have ##k## the direction of the wave's phase velocity and not ##-k##.

In many engineering texts this signs in the exponential are reversed ;-)).

In short, it's a mess, and one must be careful when reading texts to make sure to figure out, which convention is used.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Thank you all! It is clear now.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Delta2
The different constants shouldn't trouble you a lot. Unless of course the constants present in formulas have dimensions. In this case they are plain numbers, no dimensions involved.
 
Back
Top