How do submarines communicate with radio waves?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the communication methods used by submarines, particularly focusing on the challenges of using radio waves underwater and alternative communication technologies. Participants explore the technical aspects of radio wave propagation in seawater, the limitations of low-frequency signals, and the implications for submarine operations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant discusses the conductivity of seawater and its impact on radio wave propagation, noting that power decays significantly with depth.
  • Another participant mentions that submarines use high power low frequency signals and often operate closer to the surface for better communication.
  • Concerns are raised about the bit rate of low frequency signals, suggesting that lower attenuation comes at the cost of data transmission efficiency.
  • A participant references a specific US Navy communication system that uses coded messages for limited communication, indicating that detailed orders are not transmitted underwater.
  • There is a mention of the BBC Radio 4 "Today" Programme as a signal for UK submarines to confirm the absence of a nuclear attack, raising questions about the reliability of such a system.
  • Discussion includes the potential use of laser communication as an alternative to radio waves, highlighting its advantages in bandwidth and security, but also its challenges.
  • Several participants joke about the implications of communication protocols related to nuclear launch orders, referencing popular culture and the complexities of real-life protocols.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the effectiveness and limitations of current submarine communication methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach or solution to the challenges presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes technical assumptions about radio wave behavior in seawater and the operational practices of submarines, which may not be universally applicable or fully resolved.

  • #31
nsaspook said:
It is expected that ELF signals are secret. A proper OTP system makes it unbreakable if the key chain is secure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_pad
Advances in technology have made key distribution problems easier to solve.
That wasn't what I really meant.

I mean, if I was setting up the communication chain, I would make it so that it just wouldn't really matter what the three letter transmission is.

It could just mean 'Moscow calling' and they could publish it on the internet.

But if the MO on the captain's mission delegation sheet says 'shallow surface if you get a 'Moscow Calling' signal at 3PM, Moscow time, because there might be a message waiting for you', then that is all that is needed.

If I was OOW/OC and an ELF signal was detected (from either 'side'!), I might want to just pop up for an update anyway, if I felt it was safe.

I'm unclear what the fuss would be about trying to get messages encoded on ELF. If you make encryption part of the protocol it's just one more thing that can go wrong and create uncertainty. The crew will always be the ones that have to assess whether it is safe to come up, anyway, whatever signal they have received.

But, anyway, I have said that now, no need I repeat, so go ahead and pick up some ELF for yourself! It's not difficult actually, just string a big loop around the garden and wire it up to your computer's sound card and run a FFT app.

You get to see various anomalies and blips in all the LF bands, Schumann resonances and lightning whistlers and 'things'. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cmb said:
I'm unclear what the fuss would be about trying to get messages encoded on ELF. If you make encryption part of the protocol it's just one more thing that can go wrong and create uncertainty. The crew will always be the ones that have to assess whether it is safe to come up, anyway, whatever signal they have received.
It adds redundancy and flexibility to your submarine operations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook
  • #33
@nsaspook one can see the 50hz powerline frequency being the most powerful one in that graph.
But then again powerlines with their overall length and location I guess make up the worlds largest low frequency antenna array ever built. Also the most powerful one.

I wonder why they don't use powerline wires to transmit the VLF isn't there a way to combine them or would the two frequencies cause some destructive interference?
 
  • #34
artis said:
I wonder why they don't use powerline wires to transmit the VLF
Because the power companies and their customers would have a fit. I, for one, prefer my AC power in the plain version, not modulated with VLF.
 
  • #35
artis said:
@nsaspook one can see the 50hz powerline frequency being the most powerful one
...I wonder why they don't use powerline wires to transmit the VLF isn't there a way to combine them or would the two frequencies cause some destructive interference?
They could not modulate 50Hz (or 60Hz) because so much industrial kit runs off a reliance on that frequency.

Imagine if all the induction motors around the world had to speed up and slow down, just to sent a sub signal? hmmmm ... not going to happen.

The mains frequencies are tightly controlled, under legal compulsions, for precisely that reason.
 
  • #36
There's also a tremendous amount of noise at 50/60Hz and the harmonics. People that work with signal processing in this region know to avoid those frequencies for better S/N ratio.
 
  • #37
I wasn't saying one should directly use the very phase wire , just an additional wire but true , interference would be a problem I think more so for the VLF signal than the 50hz AC as that is much more powerful
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K