Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #2,701
1651734274999.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,702
Screen Shot 2022-05-07 at 9.46.44 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, pinball1970 and Borg
  • #2,703
A Smart Guy's Dream Date:
Screen Shot 2022-05-10 at 8.41.19 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, berkeman and Borg
  • #2,704
"If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside".
Robert Cringely, InfoWorld.
From; The Unixhaters Handbook. 1994.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, Tom.G and phinds
  • #2,705
Screen Shot 2022-05-13 at 8.14.10 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Maarten Havinga, jasonRF, davenn and 1 other person
  • #2,706
visitor_center.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes jasonRF, dextercioby, mfb and 6 others
  • #2,707
out-in focus black hole.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes dextercioby, Tom.G, Wrichik Basu and 7 others
  • #2,708
one for the Earth science people ...
deep end in pools.png
 
  • #2,709
Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 8.41.46 AM.png
 
  • Love
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Electrodynamics_, strangerep, davenn and 2 others
  • #2,710
Screen Shot 2022-05-29 at 9.33.06 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Ibix, jack action and 1 other person
  • #2,711
Screen Shot 2022-05-30 at 7.27.26 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and jack action
  • #2,712
Screen Shot 2022-05-30 at 9.11.11 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Electrodynamics_, DrClaude, davenn and 2 others
  • #2,713
Binary tree:
Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 8.05.55 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes Electrodynamics_, davenn, DrClaude and 6 others
  • #2,714
Anyone know what species that tree is?
(Other than Binary!)
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #2,715
Looks like a palm of some kind, but I've never seen one branch like that.

My guess would be that someone climbed up and physically split the growing crown(s) of the tree in some way (4 times during its previous life).
It also seems more planar than one might expect naturally.
 
  • #2,716
That prompted me to look at a blowup of the image. There are few junctions that look suspicious, as in photo manipulation.

Starting at the trunk, two prominent junctions are shown below as '?':
Right-Left-Right-?
Right-Right-? Although this one COULD be a shadow.

The shadows are plausible based on shadows of bushy ground cover in the middle distance.

Either way, it is certainly an interesting image! Thanks.
 
  • #2,718
_nc_ohc=Ld7dsvjqDhAAX9idyJ0&_nc_ht=scontent-frt3-2.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn and BillTre
  • #2,719
X_LzbfU&tn=qlwRRRXk-wq4AuHE&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Tom.G, Borg and 1 other person
  • #2,720
X_hZKKs&tn=qlwRRRXk-wq4AuHE&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Electrodynamics_, Demystifier, davenn and 1 other person
  • #2,721
Screen Shot 2022-06-15 at 9.31.18 AM.png
 
  • #2,722
Physics History.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier, Filip Larsen, dextercioby and 9 others
  • #2,724
DrClaude said:
For those who want more: this is from Zach Weinersmith's Science: Abridged Beyond the Point of Usefulness.

It is available for free: https://www.smbc-comics.com/covid/files/miniSciWebv6.pdf
I LOVE this definition:
Relativity: The study of how, if you have a clock and I have a clock, it doesn’t mean a damn thing
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn, collinsmark, pinball1970 and 3 others
  • #2,725
DrClaude said:
For those who want more: this is from Zach Weinersmith's Science: Abridged Beyond the Point of Usefulness.

It is available for free: https://www.smbc-comics.com/covid/files/miniSciWebv6.pdf
ohhh brilliant :biggrin::biggrin: thankyou

been reading through some of it, some good giggles and ""insights"" 😉😉

Chapter 5 Earth Science

5.1 History

A bunch of space-junk formed into a big hot space-ball. Later it cooled down, and life formed.
Then, apes evolved on its surface and tried to get it back to its earlier state.

5.2 Major Insights
• Once, a giant rock slammed into Earth, creating the apocalyptic ash-blackened hellscape that presaged the dawn of humanity.
• The Himalayas are still growing, which means that if you sit on top of Everest, you are continuously breaking mountain-climbing records.
• When Mother Earth catches a bad case of industrialization, She fights it off with a fever.
• Earth is “fine-tuned” for humans in the same sense that it was once fine-tuned for dinosaurs
• The continents look like they fit together because land on Earth is basically a sort of broken jigsaw puzzle.
• 6,000 years is not enough time for all this crap to happen

5.3 Subdisciplines
Meteorology: The study of “Is it going to rain today or what?”
Climate Science: The study of “Is it going to devastate human civilization with floods and hurricanes this century or what?”
Geology: The classification of rocks by whether they’re the crumbly kind, the shiny kind, or the kind that got smooshed.
Paleontology: The classification of rocks by whether they once had feelings
Volcanology: Dermatology, but for planets.
Geophysics: The study of really big hunks of Earth.
Geochemistry: The study of really small hunks of Earth.
Geography: The study of various means by which to misrepresent the surface of Earth.
Oceanography: The study of what happens when you slowly carbonate an 80-quadrillion-gallon fish tankjust a little snippet
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark, berkeman, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #2,726
I like these:
Screen Shot 2022-06-16 at 1.47.21 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Hamiltonian, collinsmark, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #2,727
the whole thing is a good fun read
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and pinball1970
  • #2,728
A good read.

I'm surprised.
In the acknowledgments there was no listing of Shelby Carmen Ron deMontagne.Neither was there a Ben Dover
 
  • #2,729
_nc_ohc=-TLNH1v71GoAX_lKhOF&_nc_ht=scontent-ham3-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, Hamiltonian, collinsmark and 7 others
  • #2,730
Top comment to that pic was:

At our physics student union we had a vote whether to make Schrödinger's cat an honorary member of the union or not. The ballots were put in a box, but the box was never opened...
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Wrichik Basu, jack action and 2 others
  • #2,731
1656089173778.png
 
  • #2,734
_nc_ohc=_xsxLRnaCK8AX-lWb5V&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, Wrichik Basu, russ_watters and 7 others
  • #2,736
_nc_ohc=nxmqzOY2c5UAX8y5Y0q&_nc_ht=scontent-ham3-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Wrichik Basu, davenn, jasonRF and 3 others
  • #2,737
fresh_42 said:
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

A: To get to the same side.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes jasonRF, pinball1970, jack action and 2 others
  • #2,738
Orodruin said:
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

A: To get to the same side.
Q: Why did the next chicken cut the Möbius strip in half (along the equator)?

A: To get another side.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin and BillTre
  • #2,739
Why am I hungry?
Because I'm thinking about Chicken McMobius Strips.
 
  • #2,740
Borg said:
Why am I hungry?
Because I'm thinking about Chicken McMobius Strips.
Would they have no inside or outside like a Klein bottle?
Where would the dip go?
 
  • #2,741
_nc_ohc=VjzYhZLuvu0AX9Z0Y-j&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, Wrichik Basu, Jodo and 6 others
  • #2,742
_nc_ohc=Z-d3lpn0nY8AX8TUTIx&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #2,744
1657327883009.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #2,745
_nc_ohc=s2a6FgiEGssAX_V8ZgP&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes FuzzySphere, Tom.G, BillTre and 2 others
  • #2,747
fresh_42 said:
Presumably they submitted their script to a journal in Animal behaviour for ratification?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, BillTre, Wrichik Basu and 2 others
  • #2,748
fresh_42 said:
”Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein”
- Nietzsche

"And if you gaze into an abyss for a long time, the abyss also gazes into you"

[Google translation added by a Mentor who can only count to ten in German]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,749
Orodruin said:
”Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein”
- Nietzsche
That's my usual feeling in the primate section of a zoo: Who is watching whom?

I once praised Natalie for her baby. You know, what people say about newborns. Apparently, I went too far and Natalie got the impression that I wanted to have her baby, so she spat at me. Bonobos sind auch nur Menschen.
 
  • #2,750

Is There a Santa Claus? An Engineer's Perspective​

Author’s note: All numerical values, calculations and estimates are, of course, indubitably accurate.The first and foremost thing to take into account to properly begin the proof is the number of children Santa Claus must visit each Christmas. There are approximately two billion children (persons under 18) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Buddhist (except maybe in Japan) and other non-Christian religions, this reduces his customer base by 85%, or 378 million (according to the Population Reference Bureau). At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, presuming there is at least one good child in each, that comes to 108 million homes.Santa has about 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the Earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 967.7 household visits per second.This is to say that for each house, Santa has a bit more than 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, hop out, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump into the sleigh and arrive at the next house.Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the Earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles between households – a total trip of 75.5 million miles (not counting bathroom stops or breaks). This means Santa’s sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, or 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run 15 miles an hour at best.The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element to our calculations. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a two pound Lego set (medium sized), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons (not counting Santa himself, who is, by reputation, rather plump). On land, a conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that a “flying” reindeer could pull ten times this amount, the job couldn’t be done with eight or even nine of them: Santa would need 360,000 reindeer. This increases the payload, not counting the sleigh, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth (the ship, not the monarch).600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance. This would heat up the reindeer in the same fashion as a spacecraft re-entering the Earth’s atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would each absorb 14.3 quintillion (14,300,000,000,000,000,000) joules of energy per second. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and creating deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second. This would be right about the same time Santa reached the fifth house on his trip.Not that that matters, though, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop to 650 m.p.s. in .001 seconds, would be subjected to acceleration forces of 17,500 g’s. A 250 pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.Therefore: If Santa ever did exist, he’s dead now.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Baluncore
Back
Top